Search Case Law Database
Found 22,202 judgments matching your criteria
2025 M L D 716
Muhammad Arif — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: N/A
Summary: — S. 9(c) — Possession of charas — Appreciation of evidence — Contradictions in the statements of witnesses — Prosecution case was that 10-kilogram charas in ten packets was recovered from the possession of accused — Seizing Officer testified that on...
2025 M L D 696
Muhammad Nabi — Appellant Versus Commandant ANF Balochistan and another — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-July-19
Summary: — Ss. 9(c) & 32 — Limitation Act (IX of 1908), First Sched., Art. 155 — Confiscation and release of vehicle involved in narcotic case — Appeal, filing of — Limitation — Prosecution case was that 144-kilograms charas was recovered from the secret cavi...
2025 M L D 621
Shoaib Ahmed — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-October-24
Summary: — S. 9(c) — Possession of narcotic substances — Appreciation of evidence — Safe custody and safe transmission of narcotic to laboratory not proved — Prosecution case was that 3000-grams charas in six slabs was recovered from the possession of accused...
2025 M L D 569
Abdul Hakeem — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2023-October-16
Summary: — Ss. 9(c) & 32 — Confiscation and release of vehicle in narcotic cases — Scope — Prosecution case was that 40-kilograms charas was recovered from the tanker driven by accused — After trial conducted by the Trial Court, accused was acquitted but the ...
2025 M L D 533
Muhammad Ajmal — Petitioner Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-November-14
Summary: — S. 516-A — Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.320, 279, 337-G & 427 — Superdari of vehicle — Scope — Complaint was filed by the police against the accused-petitioner with the allegation that due to negligent and careless driving of accused, the vehicle i...
2025 M L D 447
Jamshaid Hussain and 3 others — Appellants Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-July-15
Summary: — S. 7 — Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Ss. 4 & 5 — Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S. 13(d) — Act of terrorism, making or possessing explosive substances under suspicious circumstances — Appreciation of evidence — Contradictions in the...
2025 M L D 331
Muhammad Jan — Petitioner Versus Barat alias Rado and another — Respondents
Decided Date: 2022-September-16
Summary: — S. 115 & O.VI, R.2 — Suit for recovery of money — Admission in written statement — Effect — Suit filed by respondent / plaintiff was dismissed by Trial Court but Lower Appellate Court decreed the same — Validity — In written statement, petitioner ...
2025 M L D 227
Sher Muhammad — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-August-13
Summary: — Ss. 302(b), 324 & 337-D — Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, jaifah — Appreciation of evidence — Ocular account supported by medical evidence — Accused was charged for committing murder of his spouse and two daughters and also made an attemp...
2025 M L D 205
Changaiz Khan and others — Appellants Versus The State and others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-November-4
Summary: — Ss. 302(b), 324, 147, 148 & 149 — Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, rioting, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly — Appreciation of evidence — Unnatural conduct of complainant — Accused were charged for committing murder of ...
2025 M L D 198
Wazir Ahmed — Petitioner Versus Sana Habib and 2 others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-September-12
Summary: — S.5, Sched. — Constitution of Pakistan Art. 199 — Suit for recovery of past and future maintenance — Concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Family Court and Appellate Court in post remand proceedings — Interference by the High Court in its con...
2025 M L D 139
Hotak alias Sapak — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-September-11
Summary: — Ss. 302(b) & 324 — Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd — Appreciation of evidence — Ocular account supported by medical evidence — Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused made firing upon the complainant party, due to which one p...
2025 M L D 109
Mst. Samina Bibi — Petitioner Versus Abdul Khaliq and another — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-August-16
Summary: — Ss. 497(5) & 498 — Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302(b) & 34 — Qatl-i-amd, common intention — Petition for cancellation of bail dismissal of — Scope — Accused-respondents were charged for committing murder of the husband of the complainant — Record...
2025 M L D 70
Hotak alias Sapak — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent
Decided Date: 2024-September-11
Summary: — S. 13 — Possession of illicit weapon — Appreciation of evidence — Prosecution case was that rifle .303 bore had been recovered on the disclosure of accused during investigation of a criminal case — Record showed that complainant testified that on 2...
2025 M L D 42
Waheed Khan — Appellant Versus Naseebullah and another — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-September-12
Summary: — Ss. 324 & 34 — Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention — Appreciation of evidence — Vicarious liability — Common intention to commit murder not established — Accused was charged for making murderous assault by making firing upon the brother ...
2025 M L D 1922
Mukhtiar Ahmad — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondents
Decided Date: the basis of evidence to be led before the trial Court but same cannot be taken to be absolute immunity. Once the Court comes to a conclusion tentatively and forms an opinion that the offence under Section 32 is forthcoming in a case then the course open to such Court would be to direct the appropriate police station to register a separate FIR against the authorized officer. Before ordering registration of FIR against an authorized officer the court will have to form a tentative opinion on the basis of material present before it. For said purpose, a show-cause notice should also be served on the authorized officer and he should be provided an opportunity of hearing before lodging criminal prosecution against him. After such an FIR is registered, investigation of the case would automatically trigger. Regarding the police station where such FIR is supposed to be lodged the Act was also containing section 44 which was providing as follows:
Summary: — Ss. 32, 45 & 55 — Vexatious entry, search, seizure or arrest — Investigation — Indemnity — Trial Court convicted the appellant and awarded penalty under clause (c) of S.32 of the Act, 2019, mainly for violation of S.103, Cr.P.C., and not providing ...
2025 M L D 1848
Inayat-ur-Rahman — Appellant Versus District Collector/Land Acquisition Collector NoWshera, Government of KPK and others — Respondents
Decided Date: 15.08.2016; Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare and others AIR 2002 SC 2185; Fayed, R v. Secretary of State for Home Department [1997] 1 All ER 28; Kamranullah v. The Vice Chancellor Abdul Wali Khan University and others 2017 PLC (C.S.) Note 63, P.63; Sardar-ul-Mulk and others v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Higher Education Department and others. RFA No. 114-M/2021 decided on Dated 25.10.2022; Ali Khan and others v. Registrar, University of Malakand at Chakdara and others" RFA No. 70-M/2019, decided on 16.12.2022; Sarhad Development Authority N.W.F.P. (now KPK) through CEO (Officio) and others v. Nawab Ali Khan and others 2020 SCMR 265; Air Weapon Complex through DG v. Muhammad Aslam and others 2018 SCMR 779; Land Acquisition Collector, GSC, NTDC (WAPDA), Lahore and another v. Mst. Surraya Mehmood Jan 2015 SCMR 28; Province of Punjab through Land Acquisition Collector and another v. Begum Aziza 2014 SCMR 75; Askari Cement Limited (formerly Associated Cement Limited) through Chief Executive v. Land Acquisition Collector (Industries) Punjab and others 2013 SCMR 1644; Land Acquisition Collector, Abbottabad and others v. Gohar-ur-Rehman Abbasi 2009 SCMR 771; Ministry of Defence through Secretary, Government of Pakistan and others v. Syed Wajid Rizvi 2009 SCMR 105; Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Defense v. Mst. Ayesha Bibi (widow) 2024 SCMR 1323; Chairman Sarhad Development Authority, Peshawar v. Tafoor-ur-Rehman 2023 SCMR 2142; WAPDA through Chairman v. Alam Sher 2023 SCMR 981; Sarhad Development Authority v. Landowners 2020 SCMR 265; Muzaffar-ul-Mulk Khan v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 2022 MLD 1879 and The Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Yousaf Khan and others 2022 SCMR 1836 rel
Summary: — Preamble — Acquisition of land — Object, purpose and scope — Primary aim of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is to safeguard public funds. — Ss. 18 & 23 — Acquisition of land — Compensation — Determination — Compulsory acquisition charges — Corporate en...
2025 M L D 1773
Obaid Ullah — Appellant Versus Mst. Gul Meena and others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2025-March-25
Summary: — Ss. 302(b), 311 & 325 — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Arms Act (XXIII of 2013), S. 15 — Qatl-i-amd, ta'azir after waiver or compounding of right of qisas in qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit suicide, possession of illicit weapon — Appreciation of evidence — Accus...
2025 M L D 1744
Jehan Sher — Petitioner Versus The State and 9 others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2025-March-24
Summary: — S. 497(2) — Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-A, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 337-F(ii), 337-F(v), 147, 148 & 149 — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Arms Act (XXIII of 2013), S. 15 — Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, causing shajjah, causing shajjah-...
2025 M L D 1694
Hussain Zada — Petitioner Versus Fazal Maula and others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-August-1
Summary: — Ss. 8, 42 & 54 — Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Ss. 23 & 26 — Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115 — Suit for possession, declaration and injunction — Concurrent findings of facts — Power of attorney — Delay in registration — Effect — Petition...
2025 M L D 1644
Saddam — Appellant Versus The state and others — Respondents
Decided Date: 2024-April-18
Summary: — Ss. 302(b), 324, 109 & 34 — Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention — Appreciation of evidence — Benefit of doubt — No justification for the presence of complainant/eye-witness at the time and place of occurrence — Chan...