Geneva Convention
Geneva Convention legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Matter formerly agitated in a Constitutional Petition wherein High Court, while remanding case, directed to determine entitlement of parties in possession of house in question afresh and decided case keeping in view provisions of law after considering claims of occupants of property
Notified Officer omitting to consider and determine questions raised before him in light of order of High Court
Such omission of Notified Officer, held, would tantamount to failure to exercise jurisdiction which rendered order without lawful authority and of no legal effect.
R. 42 (6) (a) read with Dangerous Drugs Act (II of 1930), S. 13, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 13 (a), Convention on Narcotics Drugs, 1961, Geneva Convention on Dangerous Drugs. and General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 26
Illicit export of narcotics-Accused's action amounting to an offence under Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 Does not preclude such person's prosecution under Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1971-Offender liable to prosecution under either or both enactments-Illicit export of charas to friendly countries likely to prejudice Pakistan's relations with foreign countries especially in view of International Conventions, petitioner's prosecution under r. 42 (6) (a) could possibly be pleaded to bar prosecution under S. 13, Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 on basis of Constitution (19 13), Art. 13 (a), yet petitioner not being prosecuted under Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, prosecution under r. 42 (6) (a), held not barred.
"Geneva Convention", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1032
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Geneva Convention"
2021 C L C 824
E.F.U. GENERAL INSURANCE LTD. and others — Plaintiffs Versus EMIRATES AIRLINES/EMIRATES SKY CARGO and others — Defendants
Court: SindhP L D 2013 Peshawar 94
FOUNDATION FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2012 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH through Secretary, Islamabad and another
Court: Islamabad High Court2024 S C M R 640
TAISEI CORPORATION and another — Appellants Versus A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2022 Lahore 138
SAGHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus AMBASSADOR USA EMBASSY, ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: High Court2024 C L D 531
TAISEI CORPORATION and another — Appellants Versus A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1977 Karachi 440
GHULAM DASTGIR‑Petitioner Versus SPECIAL TRIBUNAL, SIND AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑ S. 3 read with Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1971, r. 42 (6) (a)‑Vires of rule‑Words and phrases‑Expression "interest of Pakistan" in S. 3 (1), Ordinance XXX of 1971‑Wide enough to include every thing affecting well teeing and prosperity of Pakistan including its relations with foreign powers‑Section 3(1) having empowered Federal Government to frame Rules "for ensuring the security, the public safety, and interest and the defence of Pakistan . . . . . .", r. 42 (6) (a) held, not ultra vires.‑Words and phrases.2011 P L C (C
PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH Versus ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2011 S C M R 1901
PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH — Appellant Versus ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2009 Y L R 2414
Dr. MUHAMMAD FAROOQUE MEMON and 6 others — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/PRESIDENT DISTRICT RED
Court: Karachi