Home Maxims & Terms Geneva Convention meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Geneva Convention

Geneva Convention legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 MLD 957 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Geneva ConventionSs.10 & 11Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Transfer of property

Matter formerly agitated in a Constitutional Petition wherein High Court, while remanding case, directed to determine entitlement of parties in possession of house in question afresh and decided case keeping in view provisions of law after considering claims of occupants of property

Notified Officer omitting to consider and determine questions raised before him in light of order of High Court

Such omission of Notified Officer, held, would tantamount to failure to exercise jurisdiction which rendered order without lawful authority and of no legal effect.

1977 PLD 440 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

R. 42 (6) (a) read with Dangerous Drugs Act (II of 1930), S. 13, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 13 (a), Convention on Narcotics Drugs, 1961, Geneva Convention on Dangerous Drugs. and General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 26

Illicit export of narcotics-Accused's action amounting to an offence under Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 Does not preclude such person's prosecution under Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1971-Offender liable to prosecution under either or both enactments-Illicit export of charas to friendly countries likely to prejudice Pakistan's relations with foreign countries especially in view of International Conventions, petitioner's prosecution under r. 42 (6) (a) could possibly be pleaded to bar prosecution under S. 13, Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 on basis of Constitution (19 13), Art. 13 (a), yet petitioner not being prosecuted under Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, prosecution under r. 42 (6) (a), held not barred.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Geneva Convention", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1032

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Geneva Convention"

CLC 2021
2020-May-6

2021 C L C 824

E.F.U. GENERAL INSURANCE LTD. and others — Plaintiffs Versus EMIRATES AIRLINES/EMIRATES SKY CARGO and others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 2013
2013-May-9

P L D 2013 Peshawar 94

FOUNDATION FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2012
N/A

2012 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH through Secretary, Islamabad and another

Court: Islamabad High Court
SCMR 2024
Civil Appeal No. 722 of 2012 and Civil Appeal No. 2649 of 2016, decided on 28th February, 2024.

2024 S C M R 640

TAISEI CORPORATION and another — Appellants Versus A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2022
2021-September-21

P L D 2022 Lahore 138

SAGHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus AMBASSADOR USA EMBASSY, ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2024
2024-February-28

2024 C L D 531

TAISEI CORPORATION and another — Appellants Versus A.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1977
Constitutional Petition No. 792 of 1976, decided on 28th January 1977.

P L D 1977 Karachi 440

GHULAM DASTGIR‑Petitioner Versus SPECIAL TRIBUNAL, SIND AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑ S. 3 read with Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1971, r. 42 (6) (a)‑Vires of rule‑Words and phrases‑Expression "interest of Pakistan" in S. 3 (1), Ordinance XXX of 1971‑Wide enough to include every thing affecting well teeing and prosperity of Pakistan including its relations with foreign powers‑Section 3(1) having empowered Federal Government to frame Rules "for ensuring the security, the public safety, and interest and the defence of Pakistan . . . . . .", r. 42 (6) (a) held, not ultra vires.‑Words and phrases.
PLC(CS) 2011
Civil Appeal No. 314-L of 2010, decided on 19th July, 2011.

2011 P L C (C

PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH Versus ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2011
Civil Appeal No. 314-L of 2010, decided on 19th July, 2011.

2011 S C M R 1901

PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH — Appellant Versus ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2009
Constitutional Petition No.D-350 of 2009, decided on 26th June, 2009.

2009 Y L R 2414

Dr. MUHAMMAD FAROOQUE MEMON and 6 others — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/PRESIDENT DISTRICT RED

Court: Karachi