Home Maxims & Terms Abatement meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Abatement

Abatement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 SCMR 328 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Abatement"

Meaning.

2001 PLC(CS) 346 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Abatement"

Meaning.

2000 SCMR 1969 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Abetment"

Meanings.

1976 PLD 1133 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

"Abatement"-Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Abatement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1075

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Abatement"

SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 662 of 1976, decided on 18th April, 1980.

1981 S C M R 890

LAL DIN-Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR (LAND), THAL DEVELOPMENT, BHAKKAR

Court: O. XXII, rr. 4 & 6 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5---- Legal Representatives, impleading of - Condonation of delay -Abatement automatic after 90 days and appeal or suit dead unless abatement set aside within prescribed or extended time-Application for setting aside abatement even if filed within 90 days still required establishment of sufficient cause for not impleading Legal Representa tives within prescribed time-No cause shown for not filing application within prescribed time, case; held, not fit for setting aside abatement.- Abatement.
MLD 2023
merit to the extent of sentence of fine---High Court returned record and case property to Trial Court as appeal stood abated as per S. 431, Cr.P.C.---Appeal abated, in circumstances

2023 M L D 1983

KHUDA BAKHSH and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
SCMR 1983
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 882 of 1980, decided on 8th February, 1982.

1983SCMR 1017

FAZAL DIN alias MUHAMMAD FAZIL AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus MAZHAR IQBAL AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -----Art. 185 (3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XII, r: 33- Abatement-Leave to appeal granted to consider (i) whether in presets- ' of co-appellant, appeal could have abated qua his two brothers and if so whether delay in applying for setting aside abatement could not be condoned on ground that legal representative were misled by possible saving of abatement; (ii) whether petitioner could not represent estate of his deceased brothers by representing their joint interest and what was effect of O. XLI, r. 33, C. P. C. and (X) whether case of so called total abatement.--Abatement.
PLD 1976
1st January 1976

P L D 1976 Karachi 468

MASHKOOR KHAN‑ — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF SIND THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND AND 2 OTHERS Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 161 of 1972, decided on 2nd May, 1983.

1984 S C M R 863

DIN MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: --‑-Art. 185‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXII, r. 3 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5 ‑Abatement of appeal‑Death of appellant during pendency of appeal‑No application for bringing on record appellant's legal representative made and appeal abating on expiry of ninety days‑Applications for setting aside abatement and for bringing legal representative on record submitted about forty‑four months after appellant's death‑No sufficient cause given for condon ing long period of delay‑Appeal disposed of as having abated. Abatement‑Appeal (civil).
PCRLJ 1970
Criminal Appeal No. 490 of 1966, decided on 16th October 1969.

1970 P Cr

ANWAR HOSSAIN KHAN-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: High Court Dhaca
CLC 1980
Civil Revision No. 434 of 1972, decided on 24th September, 1979.

1980 C L C 801

Before Aftab Hussain, J Versus SHADI (REPRSENTED BY H13 HEIR)-Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1973
Civil Miscellaneous No. 1053 and 2527 of 1972 in Letters 'Patent Appeal No. 418 of 1965, decided on 2nd November 1972.

P L D 1973 Lahore 567

GHULAM RASOOL‑ — Appellant Versus CHIRAGH DIN (REPRESENTED BY HEIRS) AND 2 OTHERS

Court:
PLC(CS) 2001
Civil Petition No. 1081 of 2000, decided on 14th September, 2000.

2001 P L C (C

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY and 3 others Versus IZHAR AHMAD and 144 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2001
Civil Petition No. 1081 of 2000, decided on 14th September, 2000.

2001 S C M R 328

and 3 others — Petitioners Versus IZHAR AHMAD and 144 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan