Home Maxims & Terms Jactitation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Jactitation

Jactitation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1976 PLD 97 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent

"Jactitation"-Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Jactitation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1080

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jactitation"

MLD 2013
2012-June-27

2013 M L D 16

RABIA AKHTER and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AYUB and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1974
Civil Revision No. 130 of 1970, decided on 9th July 1973.

P L D 1974 Lahore 78

Mst. AMINA BEGUM‑ Petitioner Versus GHULAM NABI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1974
Civil Revision No. 676 of 1971, decided on l1th May 1973.

P L D 1974 Lahore 105

TAJOO‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SATTARAN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1976
R. S. A. No. 29 of 1971, decided on 24th June 1976.

P L D 1976 Quetta 97

Mst. SAKINA AND 2 OTHERS-Defendants-Appellants Versus NASIR ALI-Plaintiff-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1991
Civil Revision No.353 of 1983, decided on 10th April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Peshawar 101

Mst. SANAWAR JAN‑‑Petitioner Versus TEMASH KHAN‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2006
2006-February-24

P L D 2006 Lahore 260

IRSHAD AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1997
Appeal No.2 of 1995, decided on 27th January, 1997.

1997 M L D 2173

Mst. GUL NAZ ALAM‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ JOO and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)
CLC 1992
1991-October-15

1992CLC42

YOUNUS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. NAZERAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1999
Writ Petition No.9789 of 1996, heard on 23rd September, 1998.

1999CLC594

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZAIBUN NISA and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2006
----Ss. 39 & 42---West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.5 & Sched.---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), 0. VII, R.11 --- Suit for declaration---Jactitation---Rejection of plaint---Petitioner filed suit for declaration to the effect that alleged Nikahnama between respondent and deceased daughter of petitioner might be declared fictitious, fabricated, based on fraud and void having no effect upon his rights---Respondent contested suit and raised preliminary objection in his written statement that petitioner had no cause of action to file suit---Trial Court, after framing preliminary issue regarding cause of action, rejected plaint---Appeal against judgment of Trial Court was also dismissed by Appellate Court---Validity---Law promulgated for settlement of dispute between husband and wife 4vas that in case any part of married couple disputes his or her marriage, such suits certainly would come before the Courts ojt' exclusive jurisdiction established in that behalf and he/she could not maintain civil suit, but where such relief was claimed by a person other than husband or wife, suit in that behalf would be entertained, adjudicated, tried and decided" by Civil Court of ultimate jurisdiction---Present suit was triable by Civil Court and was correctly filed by petitioner as same was filed for adjudication of document/Nikahnama and he had reasonable apprehension that, if that was left outstanding same would cause him serious injury---Suit in circumstances was maintainable under 5.39 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 requiring determination on merits---Both Courts below had acted with illegality and irregularity in rejecting petitioner's plaint and in dismissing his appeal, whereas his suit should have been decided on merits putting the parties to trial in accordance with law---High Court accepting revision, set aside impugned orders/Judgments/decrees.

2006 Y L R 2623

ARSHAD AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Respondent

Court: Lahore