Public policy
Public policy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Public policy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1092
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public policy"
2023 C L D 189
POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION through Authorised Officer — Plaintiff Versus RIKANS INTERNATIONAL through Managing Partner/Director and 4 others — Defendants
Court: LahoreP L D 2023 Lahore 116
POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION through Authorised Officer — Plaintiff Versus RIKANS INTERNATIONAL through Managing Partner/Director and 4 others — Defendants
Court: AES 2013 1 W.L.R. 1889 and West Tankers Inc. 2007 UKHL 4 ref.2020 S C M R 1722
BEADICA 231 CC and 3 others — Applicants Versus TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE OREGON TRUST and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Constitutional Court of South Africa*P L D 1970 Karachi 241
KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus DR. JALIL ASGHAR‑Respondents
Court:2019 C L D 1082
ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director, Lahore — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2019 Lahore 607
ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director, Lahore — Respondent
Court: High Court2004 C L D 1213
Messrs ATLAS LEASE LTD. — Appellant Versus Messrs PUNJAB STEELS (PVT.) LTD. and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1964 Supreme Court 536
E. A. EVANS‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑Respondent
Court: Held per Hamoodur Rahman, J., Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman and Fazle‑Akbar, JJ. concurring; Kaikaus, J. contra (in parts) that a person protected by section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 could not lawfully contract out of that protection, for, such a contract would be void being against public policy.P L D 2000 Lahore 461
PAKISTAN WAPDA and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus KOT ADDU POWER CO. LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1989 Supreme Court 222
Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE CIRCLE II and 3 others‑‑Respondents
Court: --Technicalities--Rules under statute‑‑Principle of substantial compliance" with requirements of Rules‑‑Rules dealing with ordinary subject or a specific question of Public Policy‑ ‑ Compliance‑ ‑Conditions.‑ ‑'Interpretation of statutes.