Invented Words
Invented Words legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
Meaning and import.
"Invented Words", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1102
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Invented Words"
P L D 1983 Karachi 402
NATIONAL DISINFECTANT COMPANY-Petitioner Versus NATIONAL DETERGENTS LTD.-Respondent
Court:P L D 1993 Karachi 129
AUSTIN NICHOLS & Co.‑‑Appellant Versus THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS,
Court: S. 6(l), cl‑ (c)‑‑‑"Invented word" ‑‑‑Connotation‑‑ ‑"Invented word" is a word, meaning which had never existed before it was invented and it had no ' or no obvious meaning until one had been assigned to it.‑‑Words and phrases.P L D 1993 Karachi 24
F.M.C. CORPORATION ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR TRADE MARKS, Government
Court:P L D 1976 Karachi 544
MESSRS BURMAH OIL MILLS LTD.‑Appellant Versus MESSRS BENGAL OIL MILLS LTD., KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 6‑Mark sought to be registered consisting of a label with word "Binolia" in respect of "edible oils and fats"‑Word "Binolia" having direct reference to word "Binola" already standing registered in name of opponent‑Change in last syllable of word from "la" to "lie", held, cannot make "Binolia" an invented word‑Variation in, adopted word so insignificant that in course of time "Binolia" would come to be called "Binola" by common people‑Word "Binolia" occupying such prominent position in mark as to generate impression in minds of public that same constituted trade mark‑Refusal of registration maintained‑Trade mark.P L D 2000 Karachi 192
J.N. NICHOLS (VIMTO) PLC A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM — Plaintiffs Versus MEHRAN BOTTLERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED, KARACHI — Defendant
Court: High CourtP L D 1951 Privy Council 108
CECIL DE CORDOVA and others — Appellants Versus VICK CHEMICAL COMPANY-Respondents
Court:1992 C L C 1902
F.W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS‑‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1977 Karachi 781
EXXON CORPORATION, NEW YORK, U. S. A. Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1970 Karachi 604
Appellant Versus THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE
Court:P L D 1975 Karachi 582
MESSRS BUBBLE UP COMPANY INC.-Appellant Versus MESSRS 7-UP, U. S. A. — Respondent
Court: --- S. 6(1)-Distinctiveness---Contention that concept of distinctive mark ought to be imported into every one of clauses of S. 6(l), held, not correct-Each clause of S. 6(1) lays down a different requirement and subsection (1) requires compliance with any one of such clauses-A I R 195 Cal. 519; Kerly on Trade Mark, p. 105 and Ramrakhpal v. Amrit Dhara Pharmacy A I R 1957 All. 683 dissented from.