Home Maxims & Terms Reconstruction meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reconstruction

Reconstruction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 PLD 288 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases ……."Construction" or "reconstruction"

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reconstruction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1115

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reconstruction"

SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.14-Q and 53-Q to 62-Q of 1990, decided on 6th June, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1994

Mrs. FAIZ MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Appellants Versus WIDOW OF LATE SYED ABDUL SATTAR SHAH

Court: High Court
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 2 of 1980, decided on 10th January 1980.

1981SCMR924

Sh. ABDUL AZIZ 7 AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Kh. HASAN JOO AND 5 oTaeRs — Resp9ndents

Court: High Court
CLC 1987
First Rent Appeal Nos. 421, 765 and 547 of 1984, decided on 3rd August, 1987.

1987 C L C 2256

Ch. K.A.M. BAJWA and 2 others‑‑Appellants Versus ASGHAR ALI and 31 others‑ ‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 111 of 1976, decided on 26th February 1978.

P L D 1978 Supreme Court 78

ABDUL BARI‑‑Appellant Versus KHADIM HUSSAIN‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1997
Writ Petitions Nos. 9725 to 9728 of 1994, decided on 16th October, 1995.

1997 C L C 774

QAMAR DIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Capt. SHAFIQUE AHMAD KHAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore.
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No.240 of 1985, decided on 12th February, 1989.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 196

Haji AURANGZEB Petitioner Versus Haji ABDUR REHMAN and 2 others Respondents

Court:
PLD 1960
Letters Patent Appeal No. 26 of 1960, decided on 20th June 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

Sh. MAHBOOB ALAM‑Appellant Versus THE CENTRAL EXCHANGE BANK, LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION)‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1978
26th September 1977

P L D 1978 Lahore 347

Mst. AKHTAR SULTANA-Appellant Versus DR. ABDUR RAUF NAGI-Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1984
Second Appeal No. 89 of 1979, decided on 22nd March, 1983.

1984 C L C 636

Kazi MUHAMMAD YUSUF‑Appellant Versus KHAMISO‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition No. 1 of 1984, decided on 10th April, 1984.

1984 S C M R 710

ABDUL QAYYUM AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHURSHID JAHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ S. 13(2)(vi) ‑ Word "reconstruction" to be given a pragmatic connotation and meaning in the conditions in S. 13(2) (vi) namely, reasonableness and good faith‑‑"Reconstruction" for which a tenant could be ejected under S. 13(2) (vi)‑Held, it was not necessary in every case for landlord to prove demolition of entire building and to rebuild new one in order to succeed in eviction of tenant‑"Reconstruction" should relate to substantial part and question whether or not it was substantial would depend on circumstances of each case‑Aspects to be taken into account as stated in Akhtar Sultana v. Abdur Rauf Nagi P L D 1978 Lah. 347 approved.‑--Words and phrases.