Administration of Justice, Principle of
Administration of Justice, Principle of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Administration of Justice, Principle of Justice should not only be done, but it should appear to have been done.
Administration of Justice, Principle of Where a particular thing was done in accordance with permissibility, law, held, would not take note of remote considerations.
"Administration of Justice, Principle of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1116
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Administration of Justice, Principle of"
2003 P L C 73
JABROO MASIH Versus TEHSIL NAZIM, TOWN COMMITTEE CHUNIAN, DISTRICT KASUR and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court2010 G B L R 311
GHULAM QADIR — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ABBAS and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Appellate Court2000 M L D 466
MUHAMMAD BAKHSH and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM YASIN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1980 Lahore 201
IFTIKHAR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL MAJID ETc.‑Respondents
Court: 5. 439‑Revision‑Limitation‑No limitation prescribed by law for filing revision petition‑Petition filed long after passing of impugned order‑Ordinarily not to be entertained, such rule however not inflexible or of universal application and can be departed from in exceptional circumstances of case‑Question whether or not delay in filing petition be ignored‑To be determined with reference to consequences entailing impugned order‑Delay not strictly relevant in criminal revisions as in case of civil appeals and to be ignored when order of lower Court allows accused to escape trial or otherwise causes miscarriage of justice‑Discretionary jurisdiction of revision to undo injustice‑Not to be withheld on technical considerations.‑Limita tion‑Delay2002 P Cr
ANWAR ALI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2001 P L C (C
ABDUL BAQI SIDDIQUI Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and 2 others
Court: Sindh Service TribunalP L D 1995 Karachi 459
ALAMGIR ... Applicant Versus THt~ TATS‑_‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑‑Arts. 189, 201 & 203‑GG ‑‑‑Binding effect of decisions of superior Courts‑‑ Judgments delivered, orders passed or observations made by Superior Courts have to be taken into consideration and to be followed if the facts of those cases are .similar to the cases in hand, provided those judgments, orders or observations are authoritative and/or persuasive in their nature.‑‑Precedent. p. 46'1 CP L D 2018 Peshawar 1
MUHAMMAD AYAZ — Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT JAIL, TIMERGARA, DISTRICT LOWER DIR and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2001 Y L R 2542
Messrs FALAKNAZ BUILDERS — Plaintiff Versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY and others — Defendants
Court: Karachi2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan