Home Maxims & Terms Vague meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Vague

Vague legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 PLD 111 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Disturbance"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Vague", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1127

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Vague"

PLC(CS) 1986
Appeal No. FD‑49 of 1985, decided on 8th July, 1985.

1986 P L C 1131

DIN MUHAMMAD Versus SHAKARGANJ MILLS LIMITED and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1984
Writ Petition No. 4975 of 1983, decided on 17th January. 1984.

P L D 1984 Lahore 222

Maulana SHAH AHMAD NOORANI‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2000
Constitutional Petition No.6 of 1996, decided on 26th October, 1999.

P L D 2000 Supreme Court 84

AL‑JEHAD TRUST‑through Raeesul Mujahidin Habib‑ul‑Wah‑ab‑ul‑Khairi‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLC 1986
Appeal No. FD‑252 of 1985, decided on 23rd September, 1985.

1986 P L C 277

HUSEIN SUGAR MILLS Ltd., JARANWALA Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1961
20th June 1960

P L D 1961 Dacca 844

SAYEDUR RAHMAN MOLLA AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus ABDUR RAHMAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1988
Constitutional Petition No.D‑1690 of 1987, decided on 7th January, 1988.

PL D 1988 Karachi 275

ZAFAR IQBAL PAPU ‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KARACHI EAST and 2 others‑‑ Respondents

Court:
PLC 1986
Case No. 24(130) of 1985, decided on 5th January, 1986.

1986 P L C 361

HAFEEZULLAH CHEEMA Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, MORAFCO INDUSTRIES LTD., FAISALABAD

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PLD 1976
Revision Application No. 154 of 1974, decided on 28th March 1975.

P L D 1976 Karachi 21

SEVEN STARS GOODS TRANSPORT Co. (REGD.), KARACHI — ‑Appellant Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KARACHI‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ O. VII. r. 11 --- Plaint----Rejection of Court while considering question of cause of action should apply its mind to facts in plaint and not to any other matter‑Vagueness in pleadings‑Proper course, party to be ordered to remove vagueness and not to reject plaint-- Categories under O. VII, r, 11 not exhaustive‑Court can reject plaint if positive prohibition can be spelt out of a legal provision.‑Plaint--- Pleadings‑Cause of action.
CLC 1986
Election Petition No. 6 of 1985, decided on 2nd September, 1985.

1986 CLC 985

HARCHAND RAI‑‑Petitioner Versus MANGA RAM and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Sind Election Tribunal
PCRLJ 1999
Writ Petition No.5 of 1999, decided on 2ndFebruary, 1999.

1999 P Cr

Haji MUHAMMAD ISHAQ SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKKI MARWAT and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar