Bank
Bank legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Receivable amount was written off by debiting it in the Profit & Loss account as expenditure with the nomenclature 'provision for bad debts'
Validity
No reason existed for disallowance of claim of bad debt for the "banks
Only criteria was adoption of rules fixed by the State Bank
If there was no deviation of the Prudential Bank Regulation, the claim of bad debts could not be disallowed
Since it was not the case of the Department that there was deviation, the claim of bad debt of the banks were allowed in full by the Appellate Tribunal.
Rule 9, Banks (Nationalization) Payment of Compensation Rules, 1974, which provides for reckoning of interest from the date of acquisition of the shares and its annual payment and the procedure of payment of interest and provisions referring to interest, are repugnant to Injunctions of Islam
Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court directed that instead of merely deleting the word "interest" from the various clauses of R.9, a new Rule should be framed on the lines indicated by the Court ensuring effective enforcement of prohibition of interest in future
Return of the profit relatable to the shares to be managed through Shariah compliant modes
Shairat Appellate Bench of Supreme Court directed that the law shall cease to have effect from 30-6-2001.
Bank Business-Bank-Securities bought below face value-Conversion to other securities at par-Surplus-Whether income or capital gain
principles applicable.
Bank -Letters addressed to "Manager" of Bank are properly addressed to the Bank.
"Bank", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1134
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Bank"
2002 C L D 524
HABIB CREDIT & EXCHANGE BANK LIMITED, L.D.A. PLAZA, LAHORE‑‑‑Appellant Versus EMIRATES BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED through Attorney and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2011 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHATTAK Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Court: Lahore1991 C L C 1018
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: Lahore2019 C L D 828
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN — Appellant Versus MOHAMMAD NAEEM and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2010 C L D 1572
MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHATTAK — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 C L D 495
UNION BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs BLUESKY TRAVELS (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1997 P T D 516
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus LAKSHMI VILAS BANK LTD.
Court: 220 I T R 305P L D 1973 Karachi 509
THE PREMIER BANK LTD., KARACHI‑ — Appellant Versus MOHAMMAD ABDUL QASIM ACID ANOTHER — Respondents
Court:P L D 2010 Lahore 697
MUNIR AHMAD BHATTI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR through Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2010 C L D 1829
MUNIR AHMAD BHATTI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR through Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore