Deemed to be
Deemed to be legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Such expression refers to the law whereby a thing is presumed to be in existence, which in fact is not in existence.
"Deemed to be", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1218
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deemed to be"
P L D 1963 Dacca 551
ABDUR RASHID BHUIYA‑ — Petitioner Versus E. A. HASHIM, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER
Court:2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal PakistanP L D 1962 Dacca 122
ABDUR RASHID BHUIYA‑Petitioner Versus E. A. HASHMI, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE (FOOD), NARAYANGANI DACCA AND ANOTHER Respondents
Court:P L D 1964 (W
QAMAR DIN‑Petitioner Versus ZAWAR HUSSAIN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Displaced (Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 2(6) read with Central Government Notification No. F.1., (27)/59‑SI, dated 13‑10‑59 ‑--- Mere occupation before 20‑12‑58 not enough for being "deemed in possession"‑Non claimant can be "deemed to be in possession" and can claim benefit of Notification, only after he clears all rents and public dues‑Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) as amended by Ordinance I of 1959, Sch., Part I, para. 2.P L D 1979 Lahore 810
HUSSAIN NAQI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Ss. 3, 5 & 13 (2) read with Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), S. 6-Option to get case transferred to Sessions Court-Charge-sheets, drawing up of-Charge already put to petitioner though not reduced into writing and signed by Court when petitioner's counsel appeared and made submission for transfer of case to Court of Session-Charge as such not deemed to have been framed-Special Judge however being a Court of Session while trying petitioner under Official Secrets Act, 1923, question of trial by another Court of Session, held, did not arise in circumstances.-Charge.P L D 1956 (W
SIND BRICKS SYNDICATE‑Plaintiff Versus TAHILRAMANI and another‑Defendants
Court:2003 Y L R 1903
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1971 P T D 924
LAXMIPAT SINGHANIA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, U. P.
Court: Supreme Court IndiaP L D 1964 (W
Mst. CHIRAGH BIBI‑Appellant Versus Mst. RAHIM BIBI‑Respondent
Court: Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) as amended), Ss. 30 & 2 (6)‑Word "posses sion"‑Person in unauthorised but undisputed occupation of evacuee house since before 21‑12‑58‑Deemed, to be in "possession" and tenant of transferee by operation of law‑Rent payable by such person‑Can be ascertained by reference to provisions of S. 30 (1) proviso (a)‑Contravention of sub‑s. (3) of S. 30 by such tenant Deprives him of protection of S. 30 and Rent Controller acquires jurisdiction to eject him under S. 13, West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13‑Central Government Notification No. F.1.,(27) 59‑SI, dated 13‑10‑59.2025 C L C 408
I.B. EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY through authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-II, EAST ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: Islamabad