Misconstruction
Misconstruction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Misconstruction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1221
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Misconstruction"
2008 P T D 1032
Messrs TOPS FOOD & BEVERAGES, HATTAR Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax OmbudsmanP L D 2002 Karachi 343
UNION INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: (g) Customs Act (IV of 1969)‑‑‑‑‑‑‑S. 32(3) as amended by Finance Ordinance (XXI of 2000)‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Refund of excess duty‑‑‑Limitation‑‑‑Enhancement‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Where the period of limitation has been enhanced to three years by Finance Ordinance, 2000, an assessee and the Government have been placed at par, so far any payment of tax on account of inadvertence, error or misconstruction on the part of assessee an&non‑levy of short‑levy of tax for the same reason on the part of tax official is concerned.1994 C L C 994
KOHINOOR INDUSTRIES LTD.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Customs, Central Excises and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal2003 P T D 1797
D.G. KHAN CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, LAHORE Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MULTAN and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court1983 S C M R 159
ADMINISTRATOR, THAI DEVELOPMENT-Petitioner Versus MEHBOOB ALI KHAN-Respondent
Court: --3 as amended by Law Reforms (Amendment) Act (VIII of 1972 Inter-Court Appeal-Competency-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court Granted to consider contention that view of High Court as to intra Court appeal being not competent was a misreading, misinterpretation and misconstruction of S. 3-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).2004 P T D 26
Messrs CARGILL PAKISTAN SEEDS (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive Versus CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, through Assistant registrar, Lahore
Court: Lahore High Court1994 C L C 1612
GHULAM ABBAS ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE,
Court: Karachi2003 P T D 1047
Messrs ROSE COLOUR LABORATORIES NAYAB NO. 1 (PVT.) LTD. Versus CHAIRMAN, C.B.R. and others
Court: Karachi High Court2014 P T D 535
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) through Chief Residence Representative
Court: Sindh High Court