Home Maxims & Terms Hisba meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Hisba

Hisba legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2005 PLD 873 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
MeaningHistorical background and duties of Institution of Hisba

Hisba is an Arabic word, which, in the plain language, means "to Count" or "accountability" or "to prohibit from evil things", as per available literary sources

Institution of office of "Hisba"did not exist at the time of Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.) and Khulafa-e-Rashideen

Initially the office of "Anvil al-Suk" was created by "Umayyads" to regulate markets, however; later on it was expanded into the office of "Mohtasib" by the "Abbasids".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Hisba", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/12334445

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Hisba"

SCMR 2007
Reference No.1 of 2006, decided on 20th February, 2007.

2007 S C M R 817

N/A

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2005
N/A

P L D 2005 Supreme Court 873

N/A

Court: High Court
PLD 2019
2019-April-5

P L D 2019 Sindh 624

Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. through Lawful Attorney — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2020
2019-April-5

2020 C L D 829

Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. through Lawful Attorney — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director, (Legal-II), President's Secretariat and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2018
2017-December-29

2018 C L D 587

UNITED BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2018
2017-December-29

P L D 2018 Lahore 322

UNITED BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Case-law referred
PLD 2021
examining the material placed before the Court for seeking of the opinion. In our view, the present Reference and the question posed before the Court is within the domain of Article 186 of the Constitution

P L D 2021 Supreme Court 825

47. The overall examination of the opinions rendered by this Court on the References made by the then Governor General and the President shows that most diverse questions have been sent for opinion of this Court, which questions were of law and of public importance. The consensus of these opinions show that whenever question or questions are sent to this Court for opinion, the Court has always given its opinion. However, where the question does not admit of opinion, the Court has answered it accordingly. As to what the opinion of the Court would be, the same can only be decided on examining the material placed before the Court for seeking of the opinion. In our view, the present Reference and the question posed before the Court is within the domain of Article 186 of the Constitution.

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2024
2022-December-9

P L D 2024 Supreme Court 985

Presidential Reference No.2 of 2022

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2015
3-2-2014; Multan Electric Power Company Ltd. through Chief Executive and another v. Muhammad Ashiq and others PLD 2006 SC 328; Water and Power Development Authority and others v. Messrs Kamal Food (Pvt.) Ltd. Okara and others PLD 2012 SC 371; Brig. Sher Ali Baz and another v. The Secretary, Establishment Division and others PLD 1991 SC 143; Capital Development Authority through Chairman and another v. Zahid Iqbal and another PLD 2004 SC 99; Shafaatullah Qureshi v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2001 SC 142; Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd. v. The Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and others PLD 2001 Kar. 203; Rahat Hussain v. Collector of Customs (Prev.), Customs House, Karachi and 2 others 2003 CLC 1860; The Prince Glass Works Ltd. v. National Beverages Ltd. and another PLD 1987 Kar. 49; Samina Anwaar Ullah Khan v. General Manager, SNGPL, Lahore PLD 2012 Lah. 554; Secretary Wafaqi Mohtasib and 6 others v. Capital Steel Re-Rolling Mills through Partner and 2 others PLD 2012 Lah. 493; American Constitution Law; Reading Law -- The Interpretation of Legal Texts; Foreword to Harvard Law Review 2002; Pepper v. Hart, (1993) 1 All ER 42, 50; Gadoon Textile Mills v. WAPDA 1997 SCMR 641; Anderson v. Ryan (1985) 2 All ER 355, 359; College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan v. Wafaqi Mohtasib and others PLD 2003 Kar. 667; Tariq Majeed Chaudhry v. Lahore Stock Exchange (Guarantee) Ltd. through President and 3 others PLD 1995 Lah. 572; Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Ltd. v. Provincial Ombudsman and others 1993 SCMR 948; Maxwell on Interpretation; Regulating public Utilities and Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority through Executive Engineer MEPCO Ltd. v. Messrs Husnain Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. through Managing Director Amir Azwar Khan and 3 others 2005 MLD 1979 ref

2015 M L D 1029

SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD. through Authorized Attorney — Petitioner Versus WAFAQI MOHTASIB and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2007
2006-February-22

2007 C L D 1

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others — Appellants Versus Haji MUHAMMAD SADIQ and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan