Home Maxims & Terms Criminal trail meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Criminal trail

Criminal trail legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLD 125 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
MotiveScope

Prosecution, though was not called upon to establish motive in every case, but once it had set up a motive, and failed to establish, it would be the prosecution to suffer the consequence, and not the defence.

2008 PLD 266 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Benefit of doubtPrinciple

Where provisions of a law are not clearly defined, the benefit of doubt is given to the accused.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Criminal trail", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124929369

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Criminal trail"

PCRLJ 1992
1992-March-11

1992 P Cr

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Regional Director, Pakistan Narcotics Control Board, Ministry of Narcotics, Karachi — Appellant Versus Syed HASAN ABBAS alias CHOONU and another — Respondents

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLC 2012
Labour Appeal No.12 of 2012, decided on 22nd June, 2012.

2012 P L C 401

Messrs HABIB BANK LIMITED through President and others Versus AZIZULLAH LAGHARI

Court: Balochistan Labour Appellate Tribunal
YLR 2005
N/A

2005 Y L R 2936

JUWAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2025
2025-May-14

2025 P Cr

Shiraz Ahmad — Petitioner Versus The State and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1993
Criminal Appeals Nos.3‑K and 4‑K of 1992, decided on 26th October, 1992.

1993 S C M R 525

JALAL‑‑‑Appellant Versus ALLAHYAR and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1998
Criminal Bail Application No. 1403 of 1997, decided on 30th October, 1997.

1998 P Cr

RAHIM alias RAHMAK and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 2023
2022-September-27

2023 Y L R 524

ROSHAN ALI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 1995
Criminal Appeal No.309 of 1992, decided on 30th May, 1995.

P L Q 1995 Supreme Court 488

GHULAM MUSTAFA‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1971
Criminal Appeal No. 382 and Confirmation Case No. 5 of 1968, decided on 19th June 1970.

1971 P Cr

ALI NAWAZ AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1983
Criminal Appeals Nos. 58 and 59 of 1981, decided on 26th June, 1982

1983 S C M R 428

ARIF HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: ----S. 302-Murder-Evidence-Benefit of doubt-Prosecution case not free from doubt-Charges not brought home to accused in manner required under law-Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted. Benefit of doubt.