Lathes
Lathes legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Rule of laches being not a rule of universal application, had to be applied to the facts and circumstances of its own case
Principles.
"Lathes", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931172
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lathes"
2001 SCMR 363
Haji ALLAH BAKHSH — Appellant Versus ABDULLAH KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1986 M L D 1674
MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑‑Appellant Versus NIZAM‑UR‑REHMAN SIDDIQUI Respondent
Court: Karachi1999 C L C 200
MUHAMMAD AZAM AND 5 OTHERS‑‑‑APPELLANTS Versus ABDULLAH AND 15 OTHERS‑‑‑RESPONDENTS .
Court: QUETTA1987 C L C 2121
NAIK LATH KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE), D.I. KHAN DIVISION, DERA ISMAIL KHAN and 3 others‑ ‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar2003 Y L R 3276
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDTIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SAHIWAL and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1983 C L C 647
LAL AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT-Respondent
Court: Azad J & K1993 S C M R 1559
MUHAMMAD IQBAL and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. SAEEDA BANO‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1991 P Cr
MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1985Q7
SAHIB DAD-Petitioner Versus INAM AND 4 others — Respondents
Court: -- O. VII, r. 1 (e)-Dasturul Amal Diwani, Kalat, 1952, S. 3 (d)Provisions of O. VII, r. 1 (e) and S. 3 (d), Dasturul Amal Diwani, Kalat, 1952 were in pari mareria-A statement should be made in plaint that cause of action arose on such and such date to enable defendant and Court to ascertain from it whether in fact or in law cause of action did arise as alleged or not and was it within time-Plaint silent about specific allegation (1) when land in suit was given for cultivation to defendant ; (ii) up to what period plaintiffs had received Flaq-i-Malkana from defendant ; (iii) when flood had washed away "lath" and thus when cause of action arose to plaintiff-Plaint, in view of such omissions held, was not entertainable-Plaintiff was obliged to satisfy Court that his suit was not barred by lapse of time and to show when cause of action arose.-Plaint.1996 P L C 677
Messrs PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI Versus TATHIR HUSSAIN SHAH
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh