Removal of encroachments
Removal of encroachments legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Since controversy had already been settled in court proceedings, present proceedings appeared to be merely an attempt to circumvent the earlier round of proceedings
Constitutional petition was disposed of with direction to authorities to ensure that subject property which was stated to be reserved specifically for use of Mosque should be regularized in accordance with Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002 and the premises presently lying sealed, should be de-sealed only on the assurance of the management to use the subject premises exclusively for the purpose that was earmarked in the Master Plan of the area concerned
Any controversy as to the management, right or title to run the management of the Mosque, could not be decided in constitutional petition
Order accordingly.
Petitioner sought direction against official for removing encroachments on a specific public road which was causing inconvenience to public at large
Validity
High Court noted it with great concern that if menace of encroachment was not nipped in the bud, it would grow out of proportion and that would require substantial resources to remove it and at the same time it would create law and order situation
Not only the road in question was occupied thereby causing obstructions for commuters and passersby cognizable under Police Order, 2002, but public street, footpath had also been occupied by miscreants bringing the issue within the domain of authorities under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001
Menace of encroachment being composite both on road and public street needed to be addressed by concerted joint efforts of functionaries under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001 and Police Order, 2002, passing on the responsibility would not solve the problem; it was joint responsibility of administration under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001 and Police Order, 2002, to clear public road in question and street from obstruction
High Court directed Local Government Authorities and Police Authorities to undertake jowl efforts for factual removal of obstruction/encroachment that might be found on the road and public street or footpath thereof, in planned and concerted manner extending mutual cooperation and logistics to each other
Petition was allowed accordingly.
Town Municipal Administration, Union Administration and Union Council in their respective domains are not only required to prevent and remove encroachment but also to improve and maintain public open spaces, public gardens and playgrounds
Union Council is responsible to mobilize community involvement in maintenance of public ways, public streets, culverts, bridges and public buildings, de-silting of canals and other development pursuits.
"Removal of encroachments", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931213
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Removal of encroachments"
2016 Y L R Note 194
Dr. SAIRA SHAH — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR BUILDING CONTROL AGENCY and others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2010 Peshawar 99
PESHAWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others — Petitioners Versus AWAL KHAN — Respondent
Court: High Court1990 MLD 815
WALI MUHAMMAD and 10 others‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT JUDGE/SPECIAL TRIBUNAL, DERA ISMAIL KHAN and 3 others‑‑Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1978 Karachi 464
Syed WEEDHAL SHAH AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND AlsoraaR‑Respondents
Court: S. 11(1)‑Interpretation of statutes‑lurisdiction, bar to‑Ouster of jurisdiction of civil Courts in respect of a civil suit‑Not to be readily inferred, unless jurisdiction taken away either expressly or impliedly ‑Bar to jurisdiction contemplated by S. 11 (1)‑Not an all purpose bar but only in relation to purpose of Act or anything done or purported to be done under Aot.‑Interpretation of ststutes Jurisdiction. p.466dP L D 2006 Karachi 88
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others — Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through District Officer (Revenue), Nawabshah and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1988 Peshawar 158
Sahibzada HABIBUR REHMAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, PESHAWAR through Chief Officer, District Council, Peshawar anti 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court:2015 M L D 595
Dr. ZAFAR SAIED SAIFY and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Science and Technology and 7 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2008 C L C 673
MUHAMMAD JAMSHED — Petitioner Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Coordination Officer, Karachi and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1993 S C M R 907
Mian HAKIM ULLAH and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/TRIBUNAL,
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2023 C L C 1093
MUNEER AHMED — Petitioner Versus GALYAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench))