Home Maxims & Terms Removal of encroachments meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Removal of encroachments

Removal of encroachments legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 YLR 2665 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionRemoval of encroachmentPetitioner had sought removal of encroachment on plotSubject plot was reserved for the construction of Mosque by the authorities

Since controversy had already been settled in court proceedings, present proceedings appeared to be merely an attempt to circumvent the earlier round of proceedings

Constitutional petition was disposed of with direction to authorities to ensure that subject property which was stated to be reserved specifically for use of Mosque should be regularized in accordance with Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002 and the premises presently lying sealed, should be de-sealed only on the assurance of the management to use the subject premises exclusively for the purpose that was earmarked in the Master Plan of the area concerned

Any controversy as to the management, right or title to run the management of the Mosque, could not be decided in constitutional petition

Order accordingly.

2009 PLD 309 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 54 & 76Police Order (22 of 2002), Art.139Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Constitutional petitionRemoval of encroachmentsTown Municipal Administration and police officials, role of

Petitioner sought direction against official for removing encroachments on a specific public road which was causing inconvenience to public at large

Validity

High Court noted it with great concern that if menace of encroachment was not nipped in the bud, it would grow out of proportion and that would require substantial resources to remove it and at the same time it would create law and order situation

Not only the road in question was occupied thereby causing obstructions for commuters and passersby cognizable under Police Order, 2002, but public street, footpath had also been occupied by miscreants bringing the issue within the domain of authorities under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001

Menace of encroachment being composite both on road and public street needed to be addressed by concerted joint efforts of functionaries under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001 and Police Order, 2002, passing on the responsibility would not solve the problem; it was joint responsibility of administration under Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001 and Police Order, 2002, to clear public road in question and street from obstruction

High Court directed Local Government Authorities and Police Authorities to undertake jowl efforts for factual removal of obstruction/encroachment that might be found on the road and public street or footpath thereof, in planned and concerted manner extending mutual cooperation and logistics to each other

Petition was allowed accordingly.

2009 PLD 309 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 54 & 76Municipal AdministrationPowers and functionsRemoval of encroachmentsScope

Town Municipal Administration, Union Administration and Union Council in their respective domains are not only required to prevent and remove encroachment but also to improve and maintain public open spaces, public gardens and playgrounds

Union Council is responsible to mobilize community involvement in maintenance of public ways, public streets, culverts, bridges and public buildings, de-silting of canals and other development pursuits.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Removal of encroachments", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931213

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Removal of encroachments"

YLRN 2016
Revision Petition No.213 of 2015, decided on 26th April, 2016.

2016 Y L R Note 194

Dr. SAIRA SHAH — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR BUILDING CONTROL AGENCY and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2010
2010-May-24

P L D 2010 Peshawar 99

PESHAWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others — Petitioners Versus AWAL KHAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 1990
Writ Petition No.13 of 1987, decided on 29th November, 1989.

1990 MLD 815

WALI MUHAMMAD and 10 others‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT JUDGE/SPECIAL TRIBUNAL, DERA ISMAIL KHAN and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1978
Constitutional Petition No. 1365 of 1975, decided on 19th October 1977.

P L D 1978 Karachi 464

Syed WEEDHAL SHAH AND 8 OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND AlsoraaR‑Respondents

Court: S. 11(1)‑Interpretation of statutes‑lurisdiction, bar to‑Ouster of jurisdiction of civil Courts in respect of a civil suit‑Not to be readily inferred, unless jurisdiction taken away either expressly or impliedly ‑Bar to jurisdiction contemplated by S. 11 (1)‑Not an all purpose bar but only in relation to purpose of Act or anything done or purported to be done under Aot.‑Interpretation of ststutes Jurisdiction. p.466d
PLD 2006
2005-April-18

P L D 2006 Karachi 88

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others — Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through District Officer (Revenue), Nawabshah and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1988
Civil Revision No.130 of 1982; decided on 22nd June, 1988.

P L D 1988 Peshawar 158

Sahibzada HABIBUR REHMAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, PESHAWAR through Chief Officer, District Council, Peshawar anti 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2015
2012-December-6

2015 M L D 595

Dr. ZAFAR SAIED SAIFY and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Science and Technology and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 2008
2007-February-1

2008 C L C 673

MUHAMMAD JAMSHED — Petitioner Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Coordination Officer, Karachi and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeals Nos. 199‑P, 200‑P and 201‑P of 1990, decided on 10th December, 1X)2.

1993 S C M R 907

Mian HAKIM ULLAH and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/TRIBUNAL,

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2023
2023-February-2

2023 C L C 1093

MUNEER AHMED — Petitioner Versus GALYAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench))