Deduction of Zakat
Deduction of Zakat legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Plea raised by petitioner / University was that it was a charitable institution and was exempted from deduction of Zakat
Validity
Petitioner / University was established for paramount national interest to establish a center for advancement of education and learning of internationally acknowledged standards to the talented and deserving students of Pakistan
Petitioner / University was neither alleviated institution to the category of a charity nor there existed any operative provision in Foundation University Ordinance, 2002 for its declaration to be a charitable institution
Liability to Zakat was attached to prescribed assets held by a person or institutions defined under the law, subject to only those exemptions, which were expressly provided under S.24 of Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980
Nature and character of petitioner / University, whether statutory, chartered, public service or otherwise, did not by itself create immunity, unless such immunity was grounded in the statute which the petitioner / University had failed to bring on record
Under the law, where the Legislature intended exemption, it had done so explicitly
Absence of such expression must be construed as deliberate
Petitioner / University did not place on record any specific document, nor pointed out any specific provision in its parent statute or in Foundation University Ordinance, 2002 granting exemption from Zakat liability
High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction declined to interfere in the matter as the petitioner / University failed to demonstrate any illegality in the letter issued by authorities holding petitioner / University liable to deduction of Zakat
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Question proposed for the opinion of the High Court was "whether the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction of Zakat against the income including other head of Income"
Said issue having already been settled by the High Court in case 2003 PTD 1309, question was answered in affirmative in favour of assessee and against the department.
"Deduction of Zakat", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931239
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deduction of Zakat"
P L D 2017 Islamabad 135
PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LIMITED — Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL ZAKAT, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1991 Karachi 335
Miss FARZANA ASAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs NATIONAL INVESTMENT TRUST through Managing
Court: Fiqah‑e‑Jafariyah and the said Fiqh does not oblige him to pay Zakat and Ushr in the manner laid down in this Ordinance. When the proposed amendment was brought to the notice of the then Chairman, Islamic Ideological Council, he objected to the same on the ground that this concession is discriminatory, to Hanafi Muslims. Consequently the proviso referred to above was inserted in the present form by Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Ordinance (LII of 1980). pp. 344, 346 G & H2005 P T D 2070
QAISER A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court2006 P T D 406
QAISER A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court2013 C L C 1869
Dr. MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN FAISAL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Federal Shariat CourtP L D 2013 Federal Shariat Court 55
Dr. MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN FAISAL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal PakistanP L D 1994 Lahore 207
THE BANK OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL, CENTRAL ZAKAT
Court:1999S10
Finance Division, Islamabad and 2 others — Appellants Versus Miss FARZANA ASAR — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2017 Supreme Court 718
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES' TRUST — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan