Home Maxims & Terms Deduction of Zakat meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Deduction of Zakat

Deduction of Zakat legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLD 355 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 3 & 5Zakat and Ushr Ordinance (XVIII of 1980), S.24Deduction of ZakatExemptionCharitable institutionProofPetitioner / University was aggrieved of deduction of Zakat on its investments made with a financial institution

Plea raised by petitioner / University was that it was a charitable institution and was exempted from deduction of Zakat

Validity

Petitioner / University was established for paramount national interest to establish a center for advancement of education and learning of internationally acknowledged standards to the talented and deserving students of Pakistan

Petitioner / University was neither alleviated institution to the category of a charity nor there existed any operative provision in Foundation University Ordinance, 2002 for its declaration to be a charitable institution

Liability to Zakat was attached to prescribed assets held by a person or institutions defined under the law, subject to only those exemptions, which were expressly provided under S.24 of Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980

Nature and character of petitioner / University, whether statutory, chartered, public service or otherwise, did not by itself create immunity, unless such immunity was grounded in the statute which the petitioner / University had failed to bring on record

Under the law, where the Legislature intended exemption, it had done so explicitly

Absence of such expression must be construed as deliberate

Petitioner / University did not place on record any specific document, nor pointed out any specific provision in its parent statute or in Foundation University Ordinance, 2002 granting exemption from Zakat liability

High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction declined to interfere in the matter as the petitioner / University failed to demonstrate any illegality in the letter issued by authorities holding petitioner / University liable to deduction of Zakat

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

2009 PTD 1499 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss.18 & 136Deduction of ZakatAppeal to High Court

Question proposed for the opinion of the High Court was "whether the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction of Zakat against the income including other head of Income"

Said issue having already been settled by the High Court in case 2003 PTD 1309, question was answered in affirmative in favour of assessee and against the department.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Deduction of Zakat", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931239

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deduction of Zakat"

PLD 2017
2017-March-13

P L D 2017 Islamabad 135

PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LIMITED — Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL ZAKAT, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1991
Constitutional Petition No. D‑108 of 1990, decided on 29th April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Karachi 335

Miss FARZANA ASAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs NATIONAL INVESTMENT TRUST through Managing

Court: Fiqah‑e‑Jafariyah and the said Fiqh does not oblige him to pay Zakat and Ushr in the manner laid down in this Ordinance. When the proposed amendment was brought to the notice of the then Chairman, Islamic Ideological Council, he objected to the same on the ground that this concession is discriminatory, to Hanafi Muslims. Consequently the proviso referred to above was inserted in the present form by Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Ordinance (LII of 1980). pp. 344, 346 G & H
PTD 2005
Wealth Tax Appeal No.592 of 2000, decided on 8th June, 2005.

2005 P T D 2070

QAISER A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2006
Wealth Tax Appeal No.592 of 2000, decided on 8th June, 2005.

2006 P T D 406

QAISER A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 2013
2013-January-7

2013 C L C 1869

Dr. MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN FAISAL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others — Respondents

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLD 2013
2013-January-7

P L D 2013 Federal Shariat Court 55

Dr. MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN FAISAL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2003
W. T. A. No. 88(IB) of 2000‑01, decided on 11th April, 2002.

2003 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1994
ADMINISTRATION, ISLAMABAD and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents Writ Petition No.3124 of. 1990, decided on 21st December, 1993.

P L D 1994 Lahore 207

THE BANK OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL, CENTRAL ZAKAT

Court:
PLD 1999
1999-March-9

1999S10

Finance Division, Islamabad and 2 others — Appellants Versus Miss FARZANA ASAR — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 2017
2017-August-4

P L D 2017 Supreme Court 718

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES' TRUST — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan