Military justice
Military justice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.Military justice means "a situation of punitive measures designated to foster order, morale and discipline within the military. Military Law is the branch of Public Law governing military discipline and other rules regarding service in the armed forces. It is exercised both in peace time and in war, is recognized by civil Courts, and includes rules far broader for punishment of offenders. The procedure prescribed for trial before Military Court is in no way contrary to the concept of a fair trial in a criminal case.
"Military justice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931265
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Military justice"
2025 S C M R 1150
LEADING SEAMAN C.D. EDWARDS, CAPTAIN C.M.C. CREPEAU, GUNNER K.J.J. FONTAINE AND CAPTAIN M.J. IREDALE and others — Appellants Versus HIS MAJESTY THE KING — Respondent and CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION AND BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION — Interveners
Court: Supreme Court of Canada*P L D 1989 Supreme, Court 6
PAKISTAN through SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE‑‑Appellant Versus THE GENERAL PUBLIC‑‑ Respondent
Court: Shariat Appellate BenchP L D 2009 Federal Shariat Court 36
Col. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD AKRAM — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2024 Supreme Court 337
JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Per Munib Akhtar, J. Majority viewP L D 1980 Karachi 444
AIZAZ NAZIR-Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, SUMMARY MILITARY COURT, SUKKUR AND
Court: --- Laws (Continuance in Force) Order C. M. L. A.'s Order 1 of 1977, Martial Law Order, 1977 C. M. L. A.'s No. 4 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 read with Art. 212-A-Jurisdiction of ordinary Courts-Continues to vest in them-Such jurisdiction cannot and has not been taken away by Proclamation of Martial Law-Proceedings before High Court, held, not abated and High Court left with power of judicial review.P L D 2019 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 1
Syed TASAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Secretary Home Department and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2017 Federal Shariat Court 24
Col (Retd.) MUHAMMAD AKRAM — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Defence, Rawalpindi Cantt. — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1971 Lahore 115
Mir RIASAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH
Court: High CourtP L D 2020 Supreme Court 1
JURISTS FOUNDATION through Chairman — Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2014 Sindh 248
NIZAMUDDIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court