Home Maxims & Terms Prohibition of intoxicant drinks meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Prohibition of intoxicant drinks

Prohibition of intoxicant drinks legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PLD 191 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 8Prohibition of intoxicant drinks-;-Punishment

Award of whipping eighty stripes as punishment to the one found guilty of "drinking" liable to "Hadd" when the requisite proof thereof was available before the court is not in conflict with Qur'an and Hadith.

2010 PLD 191 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Prohibition of intoxicant drinksFour specific Injunctions, regarding intoxicating drinks, which were gradually revealed detailed

Clear and decisive verdict is given on intoxicating drinks and gambling which have been equated with greatest sin like that of associating partners with God

Degree of prohibition of intoxicant drinks mentioned in Qur'anic Verses and Ahadith recorded.

2010 PLD 191 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Prohibition of intoxicant drinksPunishmentHadd or TazirWhippingScope"Khamr "Literal meanings

"Khamr" which was morally used for wine, literally means what obscures the intellect and thus it includes other intoxicant drinks made from wheat, barely, raisins and honey

Prohibition of wine was extended to all intoxicants in any form

Taking any intoxicant is a major sin in Islam and is, therefore, strictly prohibited-Islamic State was duty bound to enforce its prohibition and considering it a heinous offence inflict punishment by way of whipping or, in the alternative, imprisonment as provided by law

Whatever causes intoxication when used in large quantity was prohibited, even in a small quantity

If a large quantity of something caused intoxication, to drink even a palmful of it was prohibited

Court while convicting an accused is to take into consideration the overall condition of society at large, the quantity of intoxicant liquor (i.e. taking a sip or swallowing barrels), commission of other offences in drunk condition, like causing harassment in public, attempting to inflict damage to the persons/honour of other citizens, making nuisance, uttering abuses, using filthy language, being persistently habitual with previous history, causing collateral damage to the property or inflicting injury to some person, trespassing other's house, outraging modesty, committing rape and depending on the nature of proof required for Hadd/Tazir etc. award the punishment accordingly

Court could not remain oblivious to the overall attending circumstances and is therefore, duty bound to consider all conditions and, if any offence was established beyond any doubt, award Hadd or Tazir punishment accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Prohibition of intoxicant drinks", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931633

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prohibition of intoxicant drinks"

PLD 2010
2009-May-28

P L D 2010 Federal Shariat Court 191

Dlr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI — petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad — Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1984
Criminal Petition No. 3‑R of 1984, decided on 21st February, 1984.

1984 S C M R 750

RAHIM DAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1984
Criminal Appeals Nos. 50 to 114, 5(5), 44, 10(5) of 1983 and 6(S), 93 and 100- of 1982, decided on 30th January, 1984.

1984 S C M R 392

STATE-Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Shariat Beach
PLD 1983
Criminal Petition No. 155-R of 1982, decided on lst December, 1982.

P L D 1983 Supreme Court 66

MUHAMMAD ILYAS-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1996
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.45/Q in Jail Criminal Appeal No.66/Q of 1996, decided on 26th June, 1996.

1996 P C

MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLD 1984
Jail Criminal Appeal No. 33/1 of 1984, decided on 9th May. 1984.

P L D 1984 Federal Shariat Court 132

ABDUL RASHID‑Appellant Versus This STATE‑Respondent

Court: ‑ Art. 11‑Punjab Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Rules, 1979, r. 5‑Doctor neither reporting symptoms as mentioned in r. 5 nor examining accused "with respect to presence of intoxicant in his breath or blood stream or stomach"‑Accused having permit for purchase of opium and an opium addict‑Fact regarding symptoms revealed by taking opium pills, creating doubt whether accused bad taken alcholic drink‑‑Accused at any time not seen by any one actually drinking alcholic intoxicant and suspicion arising against him of his loquacity and exuberant behaviour‑Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted.‑‑Benefit of doubt.
SCMR 1984
N/A

1984 S C M R 695

THE STATE-Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Shariat Bench
PCRLJ 1990
1989-October-22

1990 P Cr

BHEELOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2013
Criminal Appeal No.17/L of 2008, decided on 14th February, 2013.

2013 Y L R 1555

Haji AMANAT ALI — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLD 1981
1981-April-27

P L D 1981 F S C 245

NOSHER RUSTAM SIDHWA Petitioner Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN-Respondent

Court: High Court