Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Fresh evidence meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Fresh evidence

Fresh evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Fresh evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931787

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fresh evidence"

PLD 1989
Writ Petition No. 539 of 1987, decided on 6th December, 1988.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 86

TAJ MALOOK Petitioner Versus E. A. C. I, SWAT and 3 others Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Arts. 2 & 28‑‑Circumstantial evidence‑‑Circumstantial evidence can support case as much as direct evidence if it is substantial.‑ Evidence.
YLR 2001
Criminal Revision Application No.40-S of 2000, decided on 4th May, 2001.

2001 Y L R 387

GHULAM HUSSAIN alias NANGAR and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1989
Civil Revision No.22 of 1988, decided on 3rd December, 1988

P L D 1989 Peshawar 61

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHAH Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM and 3 others Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1993
Criminal Appeal No.60/SAC/L of 1992, decided on 7th October, 1992.

1993 S C M R 51

ASGHAR ALI and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
SCMR 1978
Civil Review Petition No. 5 of 1974 in C. P. S. L. A: No. 223 of 1974, decided on 13th November 1977.

1978 S C M R 127

Mrt. FATIMA BEGUM-Petitioner Versus HUSSAIN MUHAMMAD AND 4 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: ---O. XXVI-Review-Available only on ground of discovery of fresh evidence, error apparent on face of record or other sufficient cause- None of such grounds pointed out and case virtually re-argued Wholly unjust and contrary to spirit of Rehabilitation policy to disturb respondents after thirty years-Review disallowed but peti tioner's case being one of great hardship ordered td be given priority in matter of composition or any other means of satisfaction of her claim available under law.-Review.
CLC 1983
Writ Petition No. 1569 of 1982, decided on 12th November, 1982.

1983 C L C 911

ANA‑UR‑REHMAN‑Petitioner Versus RENT CONTROLLER, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1988
First Appeal from Order No. 184 of 1978, decided on 23rd January, 1984.

1988 M L D 755

MUHAMMAD RAFI‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. BUKHTAWAR and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1954
Privy Council Appeal No. 20 of 1952, decided on 25th Novem ber, 1:953, from The Supreme Court of Bermuda.

P L D 1954 Privy Council 30

CECIL WALDRON ANDREW‑Appellant Versus HELEN ANDREW‑Respondent

Court:
MLD 1997
Civil Revision No. 1061‑D of 1996, decided on 27th October, 1996.

1997 M L D 1784

SHEIKH MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus LAL KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC 1970
Industrial dispute‑Bonus‑Demand to be decided on basis of balance‑sheet of company.

1970 P L C 21

(PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI Versus THE GENERAL SECRETARY, INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES ‑EMPLOYEES' UNION

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library