Home Maxims & Terms Object meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Object

Object legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 YLR 1379 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O.XIV, R.1Framing of issuesObject

Controversy ought to be reflected through issues and parties must be aware about their rights and obligations.

2010 MLD 1241 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.24Deeming provisions of S.24 of General Clauses Act, 1897Object

Purpose of protecting and saving orders etc., under repealed Act would be to maintain continuity and avoid any vacuum between interval, when such orders etc., may be framed under re-enacted statute

Principles.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Object", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931841

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Object"

CLD 2015
N/A

2015 C L D 972

Messrs PERVAIZ & CO. through Proprietor and others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Attorney — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2016
2014-September-15

2016 M L D 641

SECRETARY IRRIGATION through Project Director — Appellant Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR and 21 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2014
2012-December-18

2014 C L C 1106

DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE, FAISALABAD — Appellant Versus Messrs HUDAYBAIA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED through Mian Zahoor Ahmad and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2014
2013-October-29

2014 C L C 417

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Local Government and Community Development, Lahore and 3 others — Appellants Versus BEZAD HAIDER KHAN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos. 1357 to 1359 of 1985 (References Nos.858 to 860 of 1985), decided on 28th April, 1998.

2001 P T D 3197

DASA BALINJIKA SEVA SANGAM Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (No. 1)

Court: Madras High Court (India)
MLD 1989
Civil Appeal No.1013 of 1987, decided on 28th October, 1987.

1989 M L D 1632

MAHNAT DHANGIR and another — Appellants Versus Shri MADAN MOHAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of India
CLC 2019
N/A

2019 C L C 192

Messrs COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD. — Appellant Versus COTTON TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
CLD 2005
N/A

2005 C L D 1432

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN — Appellant Versus Messrs FUJI RUBBER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive and 3 others-Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2016
2015-November-11

2016 C L C 706

AZIZ MASOOD — Petitioner Versus Khawaja AHMAD HASSAN and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1976
Constitutional Petition No. 526 of 1974, decided on 9th January 1976.

P L D 1976 Karachi 1219

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: R. 5‑Grant or refusal of "No‑Objection Certificate"‑District Magistrate not exercising discretion himself but on directions of Home Secretary cancelling "No‑Objection Certificate" previously granted by him without hearing party affected‑Order of District Magistrate set aside‑‑Matter directed to be decided afresh after issuing notice and hearing parties.‑Natural justice, principles of.