Home Maxims & Terms Partial satisfaction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Partial satisfaction

Partial satisfaction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 CLD 757 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 3(2) (g) (h)Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.135-ALossesClaim ofPartial satisfactionEffectPlaintiffs filed suit for recovery of sum of US $ 108,465 under admiralty jurisdiction of High Court

One of the defendants filed an application under O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. on the ground that plaintiffs had recovered entire amount under the insurance policy and that losses had been satisfied fully; the plaintiffs could not claim by operation of law any amount as no subsisting right or cause of action to proceed further remained there

Plaintiffs asserted that due to loss of US $ 216,941 only an amount of Rs.6,620,332 towards compensation was paid by the insurance company as its maximum liability under the terms of the policy and that still substantial amount was due and payable by the defendants to the plaintiffs

Validity

Only a part of the plaintiffs' claim had been satisfied in terms of the insurance policy and remaining claim of the plaintiffs was yet to be adjudged through trial

Application under O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. for rejection of plaint was dismissed by High Court in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Partial satisfaction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931847

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Partial satisfaction"

CLD 2011
2006-November-3

2011 C L D 484

KASB BANK LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus Messrs MEKRAN FISHERIES (PVT.) LTD and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1987
Civil Revision Application No. 162 of 1986, decided on 28th October, 1986.

1987 C L C 207

BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.‑‑Applicant Versus AISH MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 1999
Regular First Appeal No.325 of 1998, decided on 22nd September, 1998.

1999 Y L R 1211

Messrs TRACK KNITWEAR‑‑Appellant Versus UNION LEASING LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2016
2015-October-17

2016 C L C 604

ABBAS ALI and another — Plaintiffs Versus ASIF ABBAS and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2016
2015-October-17

2016 C L D 555

ABBAS ALI and another — Plaintiffs Versus ASIF ABBAS and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLC 2026
2025-September-23

2026 C L C 156

ASKARI BANK LTD. — Applicant Versus A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2026
2025-September-23

2026 C L D 53

ASKARI BANK LTD. — Applicant Versus A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1991
Civil Appeals Nos. 420 to 422 of 1988, decided on 13th April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 702

ABDUL HAMEED and others‑‑Appellants Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS) and others‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2026
2025-September-23

2026 C L C 496

ASKARI BANK LTD. — Decree Holder Versus A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT) LTD. and others — Judgment Debtors

Court: Sindh
SCMR 1983
Civil Appeals Nos. 115 and 116 of 1974, decided on 26th October, 1982,

1983 S C M R 432

MUHAMMAD CHIRAGH-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN AND Other-Respondents

Court: High Court