Home Maxims & Terms Liner fabric meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Liner fabric

Liner fabric legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PTD 1335 Customs, Federal Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Judicial Precedent
S.25Customs Rules, 2001, R.107(a)Value of imported and exported goodsNylon fabricLiner fabricEnhancement of value

Value of subject 100% Nylon Fabric and liner fabric was declared through goods declaration @ US$ 1.150 per meter FOB and US$ 0.880 per meter FOB respectively which were enhanced @ 4.0804 per kg and US$ 5.6028 per kg respectively

Goods declaration was completed and the same was intercepted by officers of Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation and after issuance of show-cause notice the already enhanced values were further enhanced on the basis of evidential import of trade rivals under which similar goods were imported @ US$ 7.7 per meter; and even declared PCT Heading 5407.4200 attracting customs duty @ 15% ad valorem was changed to Heading 5903.9000 attracting customs duty @ 25% ad valorem

Validity

First enhancement of the declared unit value was done on the basis of evidence which had neither been disclosed either in the show cause notice nor in the order-in-original

Goods were cleared at enhanced price to avoid demurrage charges as well as to honour contractual obligations

Second enhancement after detention of goods was done on the basis of evidential import of trade rivals who had imported a totally different main camouflage fabrics cordura in the year 2007

Evidential import was imported 8 months subsequent to importation of appellant which was not applicable in terms of 90 days valuation data in terms of S.25 of the Customs Act, 1969 read with R.107 (a) of the Customs Rules, 2001

Data of import of other evidential import was 15 months prior to the subject import

Both the invoices relied upon for first and second enhancement of declared invoice price of the importer were not relevant and admissible in terms of provisions of S.25 of the Customs Act, 1969 read with R.107(a) of the customs Rules, 2001

Enhancement of value made by the Customs Department was unlawful, illegal and without any legal basis.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Liner fabric", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931852

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Liner fabric"

PTD 2010
Custom Appeal No.K-348 of 2009, decided on 20th October, 2009.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Customs, Federal Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
CLD 2025
N/A

2025 C L D 1165

Sheikh KAMRAN SHAFI and others — Petitioners Versus SADAQAT SHAFI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
MLD 2000
Writ Petition No.6794 of 2000, decided on 28th July, 2000.

2000 M L D 1989

MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, FAISALABAD ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1977
12th September 1977

1977 P Cr

SARFRAZ AHMAD-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1994
Criminal Miscellaneous No. G32/B of 1994, decided on 29th March, 1994

P D 994 Lahore 377

SAKHAWAT ALI ‑Petitioner Versus KHALID MAHM00D and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 2020
2019-September-3

P L D 2020 Islamabad 184

Mst. Syeda IRSHAD FATIMA RIZVI — Petitioner Versus BASHIR AHMAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2020
2019-September-3

P L D 2020 Islamabad 129

Mst. Syeda IRSHAD FATIMA RIZVI — Petitioner Versus BASHIR AHMAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1986
Criminal Appeals Nos.191, 192 and Murder Reference 63 of 1979, decided on 17th March, 1986.

1986 M L D 2888

NAZEER AHMAD alias KUDDA‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2023
Constitution Petition No.D-6084 of 2017, decided on 30th September, 2022.

2023 P T D 186

RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Representative Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue, Ex-Officio Chairman, FBR and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
SCMR 1989
Civil Petitions Nos. 122, 145‑R and 157‑R of 1982, decided on 29th August, 1988.

1989 S C M R 1332

THE PAKISTAN SHIPPING CORPORATION and another‑‑Appellants Versus RUSTAM F. COWASJEE and others Respondents

Court: High Court