Compensation to landowners
Compensation to landowners legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Benefit which had accrued to the landowners who had filed an appeal in the High Court seeking further enhancement of the compensation vis-a-vis their acquired land could also be extended to the similarly placed landowners who had, however, not filed any such appeal in the High Court
Principles.
"Compensation to landowners", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124931879
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Compensation to landowners"
P L D 2003 Karachi 174
DILAWAR HUSSAIN and 6 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Revenue Department, Karachi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S. 28‑A as inserted by Land Acquisition (Sindh Amendment) Ordinance (XVIII of 1984)‑‑‑Additional compensation‑‑‑Import, scope and object‑‑ Government or other acquiring agencies often avoid or delay payment of compensation to landowners who keep on litigating for decades‑‑ Legislature, by incorporating S.28‑A in Land Acquisition Act, 1894, intended to compensate such landowners by providing additional compensation and at the same time to deter acquiring agencies from delaying the payment‑‑‑Landowner under S.28‑A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, cannot take a premium on the basis of the entire amount of compensation inclusive of amounts already pocketed by him.2017 C L C Note 10
FAZAL MOULA and others — Appellants Versus LAND ACQUISITION JUDGE, CHARSADDA and others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2007 Lahore 434
ALLAH DITTA and others-appellants Versus CHIEF ENGINEER and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2005 C L C 1083
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector Lodhran and 6 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD KHALID KHAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2005 C L C 1336
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Rajanpur and 2 others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN and 5 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2004 Supreme Court 512
PROVINCE OF SINDH through Collector of District Dadu and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus RAMZAN and others‑‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑‑Ss. 4 & 23 as amended by Land Acquisition (West Pakistan Amendment) Ordinance (XLIX of 1969‑Compulsory acquisition of land‑‑‑Matters to be considered in determining compensation Entitlement of landowner is compensation and not market value‑‑ "Potential value" and "market value"‑‑‑Distinction‑‑‑Landowner is to be compensated and not merely paid price of land‑‑‑Market value at the time of notification under S.4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is merely one of the modes, but not an absolute yardstick for assessment of compensation‑‑‑Any rise in value of land from date of notification till announcement of award being a potential value of land must be taken into consideration‑‑‑Classification or nature of land, though relevant considerations, but not an absolute one‑‑‑Principles.2015 Y L R 2095
NISAR AHMAD SABRI through L.Rs. and others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Labour Department and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 SC MR 1334
FAZAL ULLAH SIDDIQUI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2020 Y L R 2251
SHAFIQUE AHMED KHAN — Petitioner Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad and 8 others — Respondents
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2002 Y L R 2970
Mst. IQBAL BEGUM‑‑‑Appellant Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 15 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore