Administration of criminal justice
Administration of criminal justice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Such goal could only be achieved either by keeping evils away (criminals inside jail) or strengthening the society by reforming the guilty
Law itself had categorized the offences, punishment whereof, with phrase 'not less than' while there were other which were with phrase 'may extend up-to'
Such difference itself was indicative that the courts had to appreciate certain circumstances before setting quantum of punishment; in the later case, which appeared to be dealing with those offences, the guilty whereof might be given an opportunity of reformation by awarding less punishment which how low-so-ever, would be legal
Concept of reformation, however, should be given much weight because sentence did not punish the guilty only but whole of his family/dependents also
Reformed person would not only be a better brick for society but might be helpful for the future by properly raising his dependents.
Precedent will be applicable on a given case, when it will be on fours to the same.
"Administration of criminal justice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124932142
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Administration of criminal justice"
1988 S C M R 1752
MIAN AHMAD — Petitioner Versus SULTAN MUBARAZ and others Respondents
Court: High Court2004 S C M R 243
BAZ MUHAMMAD and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE through National Accountability Bureau, Quetta — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1988 S C M R 1208
ALAM SHER and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1982 S C M R 387
ARIF HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: ----Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal-Murder-case-Certain features of case deserving closer scrutiny in order to ensure safe and sound administration of criminal justice-Leave to appeal granted.1985 S C M R 570 (1)
MUHAMMAD AKRAM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Appellate Shariat Bench1982 S C M R 1137
MUHAMMAD AFZAL‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ----Art. 185 (3) and Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑Murder‑case Leave to appeal‑Question, whether solitary statement of a P. W. bearing visible signs of improvements sufficient to form basis of convic tion and whether by placing implicit reliance it courts kept in view principles recognised and applied by Supreme Court for ensuring safe administration of criminal justice‑Such question requiring fuller examination‑Leave to appeal granted‑Evidence.1988 S C M R 315
Mst. NAJM A — Petitioner Versus NAZIR and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1989 SCMR 180
AHMED DIN alias AHIM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1986 Lahore 16
ZULFIQAR‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS AND ANOTHER‑ Respondents
Court:2009 SCMR 544
ABDUL MANAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan