Home Maxims & Terms Notice of opposition meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Notice of opposition

Notice of opposition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2011 CLD 1082 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss.15 & 76Registration of trade markNotice of oppositionLimitation

Contention of appellant was that after the entire opposition was dismissed as being time barred, the Registrar could not order respondent's application to proceed to registration with disclaimer of E4

Validity

Authorities were not justified in ordering respondent's application to proceed to registration with disclaimer of E4 as no such disclaimer was ordered by Deputy Registrar, against whose order the opponent had filed opposition

Order passed by Registrar could not be sustained and, therefore, his order was set aside to the extent of disclaimer of E4 and order of Deputy Registrar on the point was restored

Appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Notice of opposition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124932459

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Notice of opposition"

CLC 1980
Constitutional Petition No. 453 of 1977, decided on 6th December 1978.

1980 C L C 641

(PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS,

Court: Karachi
MLD 1995
Miscellaneous Appeal No.16 of 1992, decided on 11th October, 1994.

1995 M L D 638

ZAKAUDDIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLD 2006
merits after hearing the parties---Supreme Court declined to interfere in the judgment passed by High Court as there was no legal or factual infirmity therein---Leave to appeal was refused

2006 C L D 1477

GAP INC. A DAWARE CORPORATION USA through Authorized Signatory — Petitioner Versus GAP DEPARTMENTAL STORE, KARACHI and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2005
2005-April-28

2005 C L D 1529

REEMTSMA CIGARA HENFABRIKEN — Appellant Versus KOREA TOBACCO AND GINSENG CORPORATION — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLD 2024
2023-August-21

2024 C L D 676

MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2011
2005-November-24

2011 C L D 1082

PETROMARK (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1992
Misc. Appeal No.46 of 1989, decided on 20th July, 1992.

1992 M L D 2357

NATIONAL DETERGENTS LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2000
1999-July-22

P L D 2000 Karachi 38

FUJITSU GENERAL LTD. — Appellant Versus M.Y. ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition No.242-R of 1987, decided on 3rd July, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1845

KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA — Petitioner Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD ALTAF and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1980
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 54 of 1976, decided on 8th September, 1979.

1980 C L C 1272

Messrs PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATES-Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Karachi