Foreign award
Foreign award legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
High Court was not an appellate forum to re-examine final award within the parameters of provisions made available under Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937
Interference, if any, could only be warranted if the conditions surfaced the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937
Defendant should have availed remedy in appeal available to it, which it did not avail
High Court by exercising powers could pass an executing order, not travelling beyond the final award
Final award having already been filed, same was made rule of the court by High Court and suit was decreed in terms of the final award accordingly.
High Court was not an appellate forum to re-examine final award within the parameters of provisions made available under Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937
Interference, if any, could only be warranted if the conditions surfaced the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937
Defendant should have availed remedy in appeal available to it, which it did not avail
High Court by exercising powers could pass an executing order, not travelling beyond the final award
Final award having already been filed, same was made rule of the court by High Court and suit was decreed in terms of the final award accordingly.
"Foreign award", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933851
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Foreign award"
1987 C L C 1299
MARINES LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus AEGUS SHIPPING C0. LTD and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1990 M L D 1675
PETROCON (Pvt.) Ltd.‑‑Plaintiff Versus HYDERABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HYDERABAD‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi1990 M L D 857
Messrs JUGOTEKSTIL IMPEX, 61001, LUBIJANA YUGOSALAVIA — Appellant Versus Messrs SHAMS TEXTILE MILLS Ltd. — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1996 Karachi 416
HASSAN ALI & CO. COTTON (PRIVATE) LIMITED ‑‑‑ Plaintiff Versus POLY COTON, S.A., 2‑RUE, ANDRIEN VALLIN,
Court:2002 C L D 1121
A. MEREDITH JONES & CO. through Attorney‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus USMAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. ‑‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi2003 C L D 1666
ALFRED C. TOEPFER INTERNATIONAL GMBH — ‑‑Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN MOLASSES COMPANY and another‑‑‑Defendants
Court: Karachi2004 C L D 1040
QUINN CORPORATION and others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus COTTON EXPORT CORPORATION and others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: Karachi2025 C L D 1457
CYNERGYICO PK LIMITED through duly authorized representative — Plaintiff Versus TRAFIGURA PTE LIMITED through duly authorized attorney — Defendant
Court: SindhP L D 1990 Karachi 254
Messrs EUROPEAN GRAIN & SHIPPING LTD.‑-‑Petitioner Versus Messrs POLYCHEM COMPANY LTD.‑‑;Respondent
Court:2019 C L D 23
JESS SMITH AND SONS COTTON LLC — Plaintiff Versus D.S. INDUSTRIES — Defendant
Court: Lahore