Home Maxims & Terms Reporting requirements meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reporting requirements

Reporting requirements legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 MLD 1914 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Regln. 47Pakistan Telecommunication Re-organization Act (XVII of 1996), S.23Reporting requirementsScope

Regulation 47(1) of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (Functions and Powers) Regulations, 2006 empowers PTA to require a licensee to provide any information for the purposes of carrying out its functions, and a licensee is under an obligation to provide the information sought by PTA

Regulation 47(3) provides that non-compliance with Regln. 47 shall be treated as a violation of the license condition and action under S.23 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Re-organization Act, 1996, may be initiated.

2012 CLD 394 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
R. 12Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act (XVI of 1996), S. 23Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionReporting requirements

Petitioner was issued show cause notice under S.23 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act 1996 by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) by virtue of which petitioner was asked to submit International Incoming Traffic Data for the months of January, February and March 2010 and also explain in writing within thirty days of the issuance of the said notice as to why their licence should not be suspended, terminated or any other enforcement order should not be passed against them

Held, petitioner, through the show-cause notice, was asked to provide information as required under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Access Promotion Rules, 2004 and therefore no adverse order had been passed against the petitioner

Show-cause notice could not be challenged in constitutional jurisdiction

Constitutional petition being not maintainable, same was accordingly dismissed with costs.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reporting requirements", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933875

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reporting requirements"

CLD 2012
2011-June-24

2012 C L D 394

Messrs DANCOM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLC(CS) 1994
Civil Appeal No. 764 of 1990, decided on 7th Octofwr,1992.

1994 P L C (C

WAPDA through its Chairman and another Versus S.M. RIZWAN ABIDI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 764 of 1990, decided on 7th October, 1992.

1994 S C M R 238

WAPDA through its Chairman and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus S.M. RIZWAN ABIDI‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2007
2007-April-3

2007 C L D 893

Show Cause No.SMD-SOUTH/SCN/22/07, dated March 16th, 2007 decided on 3rd April, 2007.

Court: Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLD 1976
Letters Patent Appeal No. 154 of 1975, heard on 21st October 1975.

1976L86

Before Mushtag Hussain, Actg. C. J. and Shnfiur Rahman, J Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL, POLICE, PUNJAB ETC.‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ Ss. 156, 157, 158, 169, 170 & 173‑Police investigation‑Competent officers of Investigating Agency ‑ Not inhibited from continuing to investigate case even though report sent to Magistrate ‑ Inference however deducible from S. 173(2) that whenever officer under S. 158 appointed by Provincial Government, Officer‑in‑Charge of Police Station after submitting report under S. 173 can be directed by him to further investigate case‑No prohibitory provision exists stopping Officer Incharge of Police Station from investigating case more than once.‑Investigation.
CLD 2007
3rd April 2007

2007 C L D 903

Show Cause No.SMD-SOUTH/SCN/04/07, dated January 26, 2007 and SMD-SOUHT/SCN/09/07, dated March 15, 2007

Court: Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLD 2020
2019-May-30

P L D 2020 Sindh 35

Mst. SABA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1993
1992-May-10

1993 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2004
2004-April-9

2004 P Cr

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2018
Human Rights Case No. 39216-G of 2018, decided on 5th September, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1851

N/A

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan