Reporting requirements
Reporting requirements legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Regulation 47(1) of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (Functions and Powers) Regulations, 2006 empowers PTA to require a licensee to provide any information for the purposes of carrying out its functions, and a licensee is under an obligation to provide the information sought by PTA
Regulation 47(3) provides that non-compliance with Regln. 47 shall be treated as a violation of the license condition and action under S.23 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Re-organization Act, 1996, may be initiated.
Petitioner was issued show cause notice under S.23 of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act 1996 by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) by virtue of which petitioner was asked to submit International Incoming Traffic Data for the months of January, February and March 2010 and also explain in writing within thirty days of the issuance of the said notice as to why their licence should not be suspended, terminated or any other enforcement order should not be passed against them
Held, petitioner, through the show-cause notice, was asked to provide information as required under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Access Promotion Rules, 2004 and therefore no adverse order had been passed against the petitioner
Show-cause notice could not be challenged in constitutional jurisdiction
Constitutional petition being not maintainable, same was accordingly dismissed with costs.
"Reporting requirements", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933875
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reporting requirements"
2012 C L D 394
Messrs DANCOM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman and another — Respondents
Court: Islamabad1994 P L C (C
WAPDA through its Chairman and another Versus S.M. RIZWAN ABIDI
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1994 S C M R 238
WAPDA through its Chairman and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus S.M. RIZWAN ABIDI‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2007 C L D 893
Show Cause No.SMD-SOUTH/SCN/22/07, dated March 16th, 2007 decided on 3rd April, 2007.
Court: Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan1976L86
Before Mushtag Hussain, Actg. C. J. and Shnfiur Rahman, J Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL, POLICE, PUNJAB ETC.‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 156, 157, 158, 169, 170 & 173‑Police investigation‑Competent officers of Investigating Agency ‑ Not inhibited from continuing to investigate case even though report sent to Magistrate ‑ Inference however deducible from S. 173(2) that whenever officer under S. 158 appointed by Provincial Government, Officer‑in‑Charge of Police Station after submitting report under S. 173 can be directed by him to further investigate case‑No prohibitory provision exists stopping Officer Incharge of Police Station from investigating case more than once.‑Investigation.2007 C L D 903
Show Cause No.SMD-SOUTH/SCN/04/07, dated January 26, 2007 and SMD-SOUHT/SCN/09/07, dated March 15, 2007
Court: Security Exchange Commission of PakistanP L D 2020 Sindh 35
Mst. SABA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1993 P Cr
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 P Cr
MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2018 S C M R 1851
N/A
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan