Home Maxims & Terms Disposal of property meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Disposal of property

Disposal of property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 YLR 485 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 517Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(c)Disposal of propertyAccused in the case had already been convicted and sentenced by Trial CourtAppellant was not an accused in the case and he happened to be a registered owner of the vehicle in questionNo other person had so far come forward to claim ownership or possession of the said vehicleAppellant had undertaken to produce the vehicle before any court of law if and when required to do so

Said vehicle was given to the appellant (applicant) on his furnishing surety bond in the sum of Rs.200,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Disposal of property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933883

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disposal of property"

CLC 1981
Writ Petition No. 491‑R of 1979, decided on 8th April, 1981.

1981 C L C 938

Mst. SURRAYA AZEEM‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMIS SIONER, PUNJAB AND 5 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1969
Criminal Revision No. 179 of 1966, decided on 22nd April 1968.

1969 P Cr

MUHAMMAD BUX‑Applicant Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2022
2021-August-9

P L D 2022 Lahore 271

ABDUL RASHEED — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, ARIFWALA, DISTRICT PAKPATTAN and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Applications Nos.90 and 91 of 1986, heard on 16th June, 1986.

1986 M L D 2638

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and another‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1983
Civil Review Petition No. 20 of 1983 in Civil Petition No. 401 of 1980, decided on 3rd July, 1983.

1983 S C M R 921

Mistri MUHAMMAD NAZIR-Petitioner Versus Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFI AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: -- Art: 188-Review-Evacuee property-Grounds that Supreme Court while dismissing petition for leave to appeal was influenced by circumstance, that property in dispute stood "disposed of" before issuance of Press Note relating to disposal of properties converted into some other use while claim of petitioner to transfer of property was based on rights accruing under Press Note issued before declaration that property stood disposed-Petitioner also overlooking that he bad acquired right of transfer of property under para. 20, Settlement Scheme No. I promulgated prior to said Press Note-Held, apart from fact that it was doubtful if petitioner indeed acquired any right to transfer of property under para. 20, Settlement Scheme No. 1, contention was not pressed into in appeal before Additional Settlement Commissioner against order whereby property was disposed, review petition, therefore, fails and dismissed.-Review by Supreme Court.
SCMR 1996
Criminal Appeal No. 151 of 1993, decided on 11th April, 1995.

1996 S C M R 1544

KHALID SALEEM‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD JAMEEL alias BILLA and 6 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1997
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1100‑L and 1101‑L of 1995, decided on 11th December 1995.

1997SCMR1199

Messrs SPORTS WORLD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ONYX GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1975
Criminal Revision No. 1016 of 1973, decided on 2nd May 1974.

P L D 1975 Lahore 45

JALAL KHAN alias JALLEY KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2020
2019-October-16

2020 M L D 1854

ALI MADAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Gilgit Baltistan Chief Court
PLD 1981
Criminal Revision No. 137 of 1978, decided on 11th November, 1980.

P L D 1981 Karachi 206

ABDUL LATE — Applicant. Versus The STATE AND another — Respondents

Court: S. 439 read with S. 517(2)‑Revision (criminal)‑‑Case property, disposal of‑Limitation, question of‑Proceedings regarding disposal of case property‑‑Not an appeal or in nature of appeal but of a special nature for which no limitation specifically prescribed‑‑‑.Powers of High Court in respect of an order of disposal of case property, held, independent and High Court has substantive jurisdiction not only to modify, cancel or alter orders but can make such other orders for proper disposal of property as facts of a case may require.‑Limita tion‑‑Disposal of property.