Residual commission
Residual commission legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Taxpayer contended that residual commission fell within the domain of subsection (1) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and was assessable under the Presumptive Tax Regime on the basis of provisions of subsection (3) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 whereas upfront commission, being subject matter of subsection (2) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was not assessable under Presumptive Tax Regime because S.233(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 provided for Presumptive Taxation in respect of only those commission receipts which fell within the ambit of subsection (1) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Validity
Entire income earned by the taxpayer whether falling within the domain of subsection (1) or subsection (2) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was the commission income
Subsection (2) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 having treated the amount retained by the agent as commission or brokerage paid by the principal, the amount mentioned in subsection (2) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was thus imbued with all the characteristics of the amount mentioned in subsection (1) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and had to be treated as an integral part of the amount mentioned in subsection (1) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for the purpose of taxation
Taxation Officer did not take cognizance of the revised assessment under S.122(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and on the first page of the amended assessment order referred to the assessment under S.122(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and held to be erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interest of revenue
Contention of the taxpayer that the Taxation Officer based his proceedings entirely on the order passed under S.120(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was not found to be correct
Omission of subsection 233(2) in S.233(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 did not support the case of the taxpayer because the amount falling within the domain of subsection (2) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was also to be treated as an integral part of the amount assessable under subsection (1) of S.233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Order of First Appellate Authority was upheld by the Appellate Tribunal and appeal filed by the taxpayer failed.
"Residual commission", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933884
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Residual commission"
2012 P T D (Trib
SHEIKH COMMUNICATION, Proprietor Ehsan Elahi Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AUDIT-II), R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan2008 P T D 351
Messrs STAR LINK (GLAMOUR SHOPPING MALL), through Messrs Tahir Law Associates, Sukkur Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax OmbudsmanP L D 1988 Karachi 446
MUHAMMAD FIKREE and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus FIKREE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD and 8 others‑‑Respondents
Court: --S. 4‑‑Succession‑‑Deceased Muslim survived by six daughters aria one grandson and a granddaughter of eels predeceased son‑‑Entitlement of grandson and granddaughter of predeceased son to inheritance of deceased‑‑Extent of‑‑Property of deceased to be distributed amongst such heirs in accordance with Shariat‑‑Provisions, of S.4, Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, would not be attracted where deceased Muslim had been survived by daughters and children of his predeceased son‑‑Sot. and daughter of predeceased son could not be excluded from inheritance as deceased at the time of his death had left behind no male issue‑ Grandson and granddaughter of deceased would be entitled to inherit the residue left after assigning shares of sharers‑‑Shares of six daughters of deceased would jointly be 2/3 and residue 1/3 would be inherited by son and daughter of predeceased son of deceased.‑ Muhammadan law.1988 P T D 1047
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CALCUTTA Versus Mrs. O.M.M. KINNISON through her Executors and Trustees
Court: Supreme Court (India)2000 Y L R 2029
KHAIR DIN through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus EAMMAD SHARIF others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1990 M L D 1931
KHADIM NADIM MALIK, ADVOCATE‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2010 Y L R 1352
SAGHEER MUHAMMAD KHAN and 5 others — Petitioners Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB — Respondent
Court: Lahore2003 P L C (C
Capt. (Retd.) ABDUL QAYYUM Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 81 others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 P L C (C
WAHEED AHMED and another Versus CHIEF SECRETARY and others
Court: Service Tribunal SindhP L D 2004 Lahore 585
MUHAMMAD NAZIR ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus AHMAD DIN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: