Constructive liability
Constructive liability legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Court on the basis of material placed, such as F.I.R. and statements recorded by the Police, even at bail stage, could consider the question whether the case of constructive" liability was made out or not
Paramount consideration was whether accused was a member of a unlawful assembly or whether the offence had been committed in furtherance of the common object.
"Constructive liability", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933934
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Constructive liability"
P L D 1986 Peshawar 123
MUKARRAM‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1981 S C M R 1092
MUNAWAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: S.497/498-Bail-Murder-case-Contention that a person who does not cause injuries to deceased cannot be burdened with constructive liability at time of considering question of nail-Held : Not correct Conditions set out in provision of law spelling out constructive liability accused concerned can be said to be guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life.2008 P Cr
MUHAMMAD IMRAN and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1978 Supreme Court 236
Present : Anwarul Haq, C. J., Karam EYahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: 5. 497(1)‑Bail‑Vicarious liability‑Petitioner found to be a member of unlawful assembly sharing common intention with others alleged to have caused death of victim of assault‑M, holly immaterial if another victim of assault sustained only a simple injury‑Complain ant party waylaid by accused persons killing one of them and peti tioner armed with gun firing in alleged attack and injuring a prose cution witness‑Petitioner, held, vicariously responsible for major offences and his case covered by S. 497(1), Cr. P. C.‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/307/149/148.‑Vicarious liability.1992 P Cr
GUL RAZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar1982 P Cr
FARYAD‑Applicant/Accused Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1978 S C M R 45
ABDUR RASHID AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE -Respondent
Court: -- Ss. 302/149, 324/149, 323/149 & 148-Murder-case -Sentence Accused appellant R armed with a spear but no spear blow found on any one of two deceased-F. I. R. showing accused R having given blow with his spear only to a prosecution witness and not to any deceased-Accused R in circumstances, held, could be held responsible for murders only on basis of constructive, liability and sentence of transportation for life proper sentence-Accused J armed with gandasa but no gandasa injury found on person of deceased M-Accused J in circumstances, held, could he held responsible for murder of M only on basis of constructive liability and liable for a sentence of transportation for life-Accused J, however, striking deceased R with gandasa and gandaia injury on R's head proved by doctor, accused J having struck R with a formidable weapon on head, held, intended to cause death and rightly awarded sentence of death. Sentence.2011 M L D 1171
MULO AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1987 M L D 3290
MUHAMMAD YUNIS — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2003 M L D 1191
SHARBAT and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi