Revocation
Revocation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Precondition for revocation of a gift as provided by section 167 of the Muhammadan Law is that it can only be revoked before delivery of possession
It implies that despite declaration of gift by the donor and its acceptance by the donee, the donor may change its mind and may not complete the gift by not delivering the possession.
Status of appellant to be the sole executor of the Will when his mother did not predecease the testator, the validity of Will and testament and whether it had been executed validly in accordance with law, were prima facie not without cloud
Will itself was called into question by respondents and needed to be determined
Trial Court attended all material facts and circumstances while annulling probate
Findings of earlier order of Trial Court in favour of appellant were bad in terms of explanations (a) to (c) and illustrations (i) and (ii) of S.263 of Succession Act, 1925
High Court declined to interfere in findings of Trial Court
Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
Islamic Law, in such like events, does not give husband any right to revoke the gift.
Conditions.
Petitioner divorced his wife on 28-12-2010 and Arbitration Council issued notice under S.7 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, for reconciliation/confirmation of divorce
Plea raised by petitioner was that by means of letter dated 24-3-2011, he had revoked divorce, therefore, Arbitration Council could not proceed in the matter
Validity
After letter dated 24-3-2011, was sent by petitioner, Arbitration Council had no jurisdiction or authority to proceed further into the matter either in confirming divorce dated 28-12-2010, or embark upon in reconciliation of marriage contracted between the parties
High Court restricted Arbitration Council to act further in the matter after letter dated 24-3-2011 was sent by petitioner
Petition was allowed accordingly.
Other condition which is required to be made is that such express or otherwise revocation of Talaq be within a period of 90 days to be reckoned from the date of receipt of notice of Talaq by the Chairman Arbitration Council.
"Revocation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933935
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revocation"
2001 P T D 1885
N/A
Court: 243 I T R 3032002 C L C 1015
LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General — Petitioner Versus Messrs NAZIR & CO. (PVT.) LTD. — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1966 Dacca 69
M. A. NASER‑Appellant Versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN EASTERN RAILWAY AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:2013 M L D 1392
MUHAMMAD HASSAN — Plaintiff Versus SHAMSUDDIN and 4 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh2011 C L D 833
ROYAL PVC (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS and another — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1978 Lahore 328
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ-Petitioner Versus Mst. FAIZ ELAHI AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents
Court: -- So. 7(1), (3) & 8 --Dissolution of marriage through khula' by agreement of both spouses-Does not strictly fall under S.7(1) but under' S. 8--Such khula' not revocable-Application for cancellation or revocation to Chairman and conduct of proceedings and issue of cancellation certificate by him-Held, without competence and without lawful-authority-Doubt on question of interpretation of S 8 read with S. 7(3)-To be resolved in favour of interpretation which is in accord with and advances Islamic Law and philosophy.-Divorce-Khula'.2001 Y L R 3153
Khawaja TAUQEER AHMED — Plaintiff Versus Khawaja BASHIR AHMED and 4 others — Defendants
Court: Karachi1999 P T D 183
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Smt. M.C. SATHIYAVATHI
Court: 225 I T R 1092000 C L C 27
Rao INAYAT ALI ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus DIWAN ALI ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1996 C L C 1979
MUHAMMAD DIN and 9 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. ABSAR FATIMA and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore