Home Maxims & Terms Revocation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Revocation

Revocation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 SCMR 2012 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Revocation

Precondition for revocation of a gift as provided by section 167 of the Muhammadan Law is that it can only be revoked before delivery of possession

It implies that despite declaration of gift by the donor and its acceptance by the donee, the donor may change its mind and may not complete the gift by not delivering the possession.

2022 CLC 1160 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.263Sindh Civil Court Rules (O.S.), R.342Letter of probateRevocationLetter of probate was issued in favour of mother of appellant who was widow of deceasedMother of appellant / widow later on filed an application to include certain other properties in letter of probateOn application filed by respondents, Trial Court revoked letter of probate issued in favour of mother of appellantValidity

Status of appellant to be the sole executor of the Will when his mother did not predecease the testator, the validity of Will and testament and whether it had been executed validly in accordance with law, were prima facie not without cloud

Will itself was called into question by respondents and needed to be determined

Trial Court attended all material facts and circumstances while annulling probate

Findings of earlier order of Trial Court in favour of appellant were bad in terms of explanations (a) to (c) and illustrations (i) and (ii) of S.263 of Succession Act, 1925

High Court declined to interfere in findings of Trial Court

Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

2021 PLD 33 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
GiftRevocationEffectGift made by husband in favour of his wife is to made more congeniality

Islamic Law, in such like events, does not give husband any right to revoke the gift.

2019 CLC 309 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
GiftRevocation

Conditions.

2012 PLD 195 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.7(3)Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petition-TalaqRevocation

Petitioner divorced his wife on 28-12-2010 and Arbitration Council issued notice under S.7 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, for reconciliation/confirmation of divorce

Plea raised by petitioner was that by means of letter dated 24-3-2011, he had revoked divorce, therefore, Arbitration Council could not proceed in the matter

Validity

After letter dated 24-3-2011, was sent by petitioner, Arbitration Council had no jurisdiction or authority to proceed further into the matter either in confirming divorce dated 28-12-2010, or embark upon in reconciliation of marriage contracted between the parties

High Court restricted Arbitration Council to act further in the matter after letter dated 24-3-2011 was sent by petitioner

Petition was allowed accordingly.

2012 PLD 195 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 7(3)TalaqRevocationPre-conditionsTalaq can be revoked which can either be express or otherwise

Other condition which is required to be made is that such express or otherwise revocation of Talaq be within a period of 90 days to be reckoned from the date of receipt of notice of Talaq by the Chairman Arbitration Council.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Revocation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933935

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revocation"

PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos.1214 to 1217 of 1986 (References Nos.762 to 765.of 1986), decided on 27th August, 1998.

2001 P T D 1885

N/A

Court: 243 I T R 303
CLC 2002
N/A

2002 C L C 1015

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General — Petitioner Versus Messrs NAZIR & CO. (PVT.) LTD. — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1966
First Appeal No. 71 of 1964 and Civil Rule No. 34(5) of 1964, decided on 12th May 1964.

P L D 1966 Dacca 69

M. A. NASER‑Appellant Versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN EASTERN RAILWAY AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2013
2012-October-8

2013 M L D 1392

MUHAMMAD HASSAN — Plaintiff Versus SHAMSUDDIN and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2011
2010-December-29

2011 C L D 833

ROYAL PVC (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. SCO of 1977, decided on 26th May 1977.

P L D 1978 Lahore 328

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ-Petitioner Versus Mst. FAIZ ELAHI AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: -- So. 7(1), (3) & 8 --Dissolution of marriage through khula' by agreement of both spouses-Does not strictly fall under S.7(1) but under' S. 8--Such khula' not revocable-Application for cancellation or revocation to Chairman and conduct of proceedings and issue of cancellation certificate by him-Held, without competence and without lawful-authority-Doubt on question of interpretation of S 8 read with S. 7(3)-To be resolved in favour of interpretation which is in accord with and advances Islamic Law and philosophy.-Divorce-Khula'.
YLR 2001
Civil Suit No. 1503 of 2000, decided on 21st December, 2000.

2001 Y L R 3153

Khawaja TAUQEER AHMED — Plaintiff Versus Khawaja BASHIR AHMED and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PTD 1999
Tax Cases Nos.482 to 486 and References Nos.424 to 428 of 1984, decided on 15th April, 1996.

1999 P T D 183

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Smt. M.C. SATHIYAVATHI

Court: 225 I T R 109
CLC 2000
Regular First Appeal No. 126 of 1998, heard on 10th March, 1999.

2000 C L C 27

Rao INAYAT ALI ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus DIWAN ALI ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1996
First Appeal from Order No. 17 of 1986/BWP, decided on 29th May, 1996.

1996 C L C 1979

MUHAMMAD DIN and 9 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. ABSAR FATIMA and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore