Replacement of product
Replacement of product legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Consumer purchased brand new car and due to some manufacturing defect its gearbox leaked and the same was replaced by the manufacturer
Trial Court decreed the case in favour of consumer and directed manufacturer to replace defective car with brand new one
Plea raised by manufacturer was that such relief conferred unjust enrichment upon consumer because of increased value of new model and diminished value of purchased vehicle due to its continuous use by consumer as it did not have the same impact and was liable to be treated differently
Validity
Original manufacturer's seal of gearbox was broken and replaced locally
New gearbox supplied in sealed condition by manufacturer was not fitted in the vehicle
Unsealing of gearbox was as serious as unsealing of engine of a new vehicle
Trial Court was correct to hold that consumer was supplied a defective car by manufacturer and that its repair by dealership diminished its value so as to deprive the consumer of brand new car that he had purchased
Consumer demanded replacement of vehicle at the time of detection of defect and took delivery of repaired vehicle after signing customer's satisfaction report under protest
Manufacturer was liable for defective construction of gearbox housing and for breach of warranty by consequent repair that the engine installation and gearbox assembly remained in original condition
Manufacturer's liability had arisen under the provisions of Ss.6 and 8 of Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005
High Court directed the consumer to return his purchased vehicle to manufacturer who would forthwith refund the full price thereof received from consumer
High Court further directed that in case consumer did not return the vehicle to manufacturer he would lose his right of receiving accrued profit on the price paid, resultantly judgment passed by Trial Court was modified
Appeal was dismissed accordingly.
"Replacement of product", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124933944
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Replacement of product"
P L D 2012 Lahore 264
CHAIRMAN INDUS MOTORS CO. — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2000 P T D 3500
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SREE NARASIMHA TEXTILES (P.) LTD.
Court: 238 I T R 3512014 P T D 1837
PAKISTAN FRUIT JUICES CO. (PVT.) LTD., and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Lahore High Court2000 P T D 2204
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus COOPERATIVE SUGARS LTD.
Court: 235 I T R 344P L D 2013 Lahore 73
MUHAMMAD AZAM — Appellant Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2013 C L D 228
MUHAMMAD AZAM — Appellant Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2015 Lahore 140
Messrs ASKARI LEASING LTD. Through Chief Manager — Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2015 C L D 196
Messrs ASKARI LEASING LTD. Through Chief Manager — Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2023 C L D 984
The INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus ABDUL KHALID GILL and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)P L D 2023 Lahore 516
The INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus ABDUL KHALID GILL and another — Respondents
Court: High Court