Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Payment in due course meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Payment in due course

Payment in due course legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 PLD 370 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 10"Payment in due course"MeaningPay-Order

Bank's right to stop payment of pay-order at the request of its purchaser or issue duplicate pay order without request/consent of its beneficiary

Scope and procedure stated.

2012 CLD 1183 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 10"Payment in due course"MeaningPay-Order

Bank's right to stop payment of pay-order at the request of its purchaser or issue duplicate pay order without request/consent of its beneficiary

Scope and procedure stated.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Payment in due course", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937006

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Payment in due course"

PLD 1957
26th January 1956, from Appellate Decree No. 273 of 1954

P L D 1957 Dacca 558

THE EAST PAKISTAN PROVINCIAL CO‑OPERATIVE BANK, LTD.‑Appellant Versus THE EASTERN FEDERAL UNION INSURANCE Co. LTD. and

Court: High Court
CLD 2012
N/A

2012 C L D 1183

Chaudhry MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LTD. through Manager — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2012
N/A

P L D 2012 Lahore 370

Chaudhry MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LTD. through Manager — Respondent

Court: High Court
YLR 2001
Writ Petition No. 11275 of 1998, decided on 6th July, 2000.

2001 Y L R 2906

MUHAMMAD FEROZE GHANI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MEPCO (WAPDA) through Chief Executive, Khanewal Road, Multan and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1994
High Court Appeal No. 99 of 1988, decided on 30th December, 1993.

1994 C L C 2116

UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeal No. 46 of 1954, decided on 7th May 1957, from the Supreme Court of Ceylon.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 199

BADURDIN MOHAMEDALLY‑.Appellants Versus G. E. MISSO and another‑Respondents

Court: (a) Promissory note‑----Mortgage bond executed in lieu of Bond's contents held to be equivocal‑Indorsement by Notary Public on back of note not indicating discharge of note‑Drawer of note held liable to holder in due course‑(Ceylon case) Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), Ss. 6.0 & 82 Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Ss. 91 & 92‑Evidence of Notary Public that note was discharged inadmissible.
MLD 1990
Regular First Appeal No. 4 of 1990, heard on 5th March, 1990.

1990 M L D 1895

SUB‑TREASURY OFFICER, ALIPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARGARH and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus SHABBIR AHMAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1975
Suit No. 60 of 1968, decided on 18th June 1974.

P L D 1975 Karachi 252

ANSAR AHMED-Plaintiff Versus BANK OF AMERICA, KARACHI-Defendant

Court:
PLD 1952
16th October 1951, against the decree of Sheikh Maqbool Ahmad, Addi tional District Judge, Lahore, dated the 22nd December 1949, affirming that of Chaudhri Muhammad Anwar, Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Lahore, dated the 23rd May 1949, decreeing the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 2,780‑7‑0 with costs

P L D 1952 Lahore 89

THE IMPERIAL BANK OF INDIA, LAHORE — Defendant‑Appellant Versus M. M. AZIM‑Plaintiff‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1986
Case No. 5 of 1984, decided on 31st November, 1985.

1986 P Cr

THE STATE‑‑Complainant Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Accused

Court: Special Court of Offences in Banks

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library