Home Maxims & Terms Meaning meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Meaning

Meaning legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLC(CS) 510 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Back benefits, concept ofMeaning

"Back benefits", as discussed in present case, were confined to arrears of pay and other emoluments denied due to wrongful dismissal or removal.

2026 PLD 145 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Back benefits, concept ofMeaning

"Back benefits", as discussed in present case, were confined to arrears of pay and other emoluments denied due to wrongful dismissal or removal.

2026 CLC 782 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O.XXVI, R.9Word “elucidate”Meaning

Word “elucidate” means to clear/clarify/illuminate/to shed light on.

2026 CLC 141 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Acta publica praesumuntur rite esse acta"Meaning

Official acts are presumed to have been rightly done.

2026 PTD 392 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Nemo pro alterius facto punieturMeaning

No one should be punished for the deed of another.

2025 SCMR 955 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Fraus et jus nunquam cohabitantMeaning

Fraud and justice never dwell together.

2025 SCMR 495 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propriaMeaning

No one should benefit from their wrongdoing.

2025 SCMR 206 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 8(5)Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4Proforma promotionWrongly published sectionMaxim "actus curiae neminem gravabit"Meaning

Appeal filed by appellant seeking proforma promotion under section 8(5) of Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 was dismissed by the Service Tribunal

Validity

Service Tribunal based its judgment on incorrect exposition of law which was result of adverting to a wrongly published gazette notification

Patent and obvious error or oversight on the part of Court in any order or decision, could be reviewed sanguine to legal maxim "actus curiae neminem gravabit" meaning that no man should suffer because of the fault of Court or delay in the procedure

There is de rigueur sense of duty in administration of justice that Court and Tribunal should become conscious and cognizant that as a consequence of their mistake, nobody should become victim of injustice and in the event of any injustice or harm suffered because of a mistake of Court, the same should be remedied by making necessary corrections forthwith

Supreme Court set aside judgment passed against appellant/civil servant and matter was remanded to Service Tribunal for decision afresh.

2025 SCMR 140 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XXVI, R.1Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 188Review, power ofGroundsMistake or error apparent on the face of recordMeaning

One of the grounds to exercise the power of review is when some mistake or error apparent on the face of record is found

An error on the face of record must be such an error which must strike one on mere looking at the record and would not require any in-depth process of reasoning on the points where there may conceivably be two opinions

Thus an error which is required to be detected by a process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error on the face of the record

Error apparent on the face of the proceedings is an error which is based on clear ignorance or disregard of the provisions of law

Any order or decision or judgment cannot be corrected merely because it is erroneous in law or on the ground that a different view could have been taken by the court/tribunal on a point of fact or law.

2025 PTD 231 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XXVI, R.1Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 188Review, power ofGroundsMistake or error apparent on the face of recordMeaning

One of the grounds to exercise the power of review is when some mistake or error apparent on the face of record is found

An error on the face of record must be such an error which must strike one on mere looking at the record and would not require any in-depth process of reasoning on the points where there may conceivably be two opinions

Thus an error which is required to be detected by a process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error on the face of the record

Error apparent on the face of the proceedings is an error which is based on clear ignorance or disregard of the provisions of law

Any order or decision or judgment cannot be corrected merely because it is erroneous in law or on the ground that a different view could have been taken by the court/tribunal on a point of fact or law.

2025 PLD 612 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ex debito justitiaeMeaning

Doctrine of ex debito justitiae refers to remedies to which a person is entitled to as of right, as opposed to a remedy which is discretionary

Such maxim applies to remedies that a Court is bound to give when they are claimed, as distinct from those that it has discretion to grant, where it is the foremost duty of Court to do complete justice.

2025 PLD 612 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Fiat justitia ruat caelumMeaning

Let justice be done though heavens fall.

2025 PLD 478 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onusMeaning

He who derives a benefit ought also to bear a burden.

2025 PTD 780 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Actus curiae neminem gravabitMeaning

An act of Court or any authority must not cause prejudice to any individual.

2025 CLD 324 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
PetitionExpression "disposed of accordingly"Meaning

Said expression significantly means that the petition was disposed of in terms of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner

So, an order stating that counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition after arguments…. "disposed of accordingly"… means that subject petition is terminated, settled, ended, concluded or closed as desired by the counsel for the petitioner after arguments and consideration of the merits of the case.

2025 MLD 523 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.5, Sched.Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance, stipulated amount for pronouncing divorce and 04 tolas goldNikahnama, Clause 18ScopePrompt and deferred dowerMeaning

Parties had mutually agreed that in case of divorce or contracting second marriage by the husband/respondent, respondent would provide the stipulated amount as specified in Cl. 18 of Nikahnama

Contention of the respondent was that the condition imposed in the Nikahnama was contrary to the law and Islamic injunctions

Validity

Where no specific or definite period is settled for the payment of deferred dower, wife would become entitled to dower at the event of dissolution of marriage or on the death of any of the spouses

If any sum or property is agreed to be paid or given to the wife on the happening of some specified event, the same would become payable on the occurrence of that specified event as a deferred dower

There was a specific stipulation in the Nikahnama that in case of divorcing the petitioner or contracting second marriage by the respondent, he would pay an amount of Rs 300,000/- to the petitioner

Admittedly, respondent had divorced the petitioner, therefore, petitioner was entitled to recover the amount as stipulated in Nikahnama by construing the same as deferred dower

Respondent had failed to substantiate his stance as taken in his written statement qua pronouncing of divorce upon petitioner on her insistence

Family Court rightly resolved the issue qua entitlement of respondent for receiving stipulated amount, whereas, Appellate Court fell in obvious error disentitling petitioner from recovering that amount

Petitioner failed to substantiate her claim that the respondent snatched gold ornaments from her as petitioner in her cross-examination acknowledged that on the day of alleged snatching, respondent was abroad

Constitutional petitions were allowed and judgment and decree passed by Appellate Court was set aside to the extent of entitling the petitioner to recover 04 tolas gold ornaments and declined her claim to recover the stipulated amount from the respondent and to that extent judgment and decree of Trial Court was restored.

2025 MLD 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Reasonable and probable cause"Meaning

It means an honest belief in the guilt of the accused based on a full conviction founded upon reasonable grounds of the existence of circumstances, which assuming them to be true would reasonably lead any ordinary prudent man and cautious man placed in the position of the accuser to the conclusion that such person charged was probably guilty of the crime imputed.

2025 MLD 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Word "malice"Meaning

Malice means the presence of some improper and wrongful motive that is to say, some motive other than desire to bring to justice a person whom the prosecutor honestly believes to be guilty.

2025 CLC 306 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O.VII, R.11"Barred by law"Word "law"Meaning"Law" means written law or statute law and is used in generic sense

Law includes Constitution, statutes, judicial principles, rules, by-laws, etc., which squarely fall within the ambit of Clause (d) of R. 11 of O.VII, C.P.C.

2025 CLD 1130 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Actus curiae neminem gravabitMeaning

Act of Court should prejudice no man.

2025 CLC 1328 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of the High CourtScopeAlternate remedy, availability ofPrinciplesAdequate remedyMeaningConstitutional relief not available where statutory remedy existsDoctrine of exhaustion of remediesExtraordinary remedy under constitutional jurisdiction of High CourtScopeComputerized National Identity Card (CNIC) of the petitioner was blocked on the direction of the Executing CourtThe Executing Court issued the order directing NADRA (Respondent No.2) to block the petitioner's CNICThe petitioner did not challenge the order blocking CNIC before the High CourtThe petitioner instead of approaching the Trial Court invoked constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court

Held: The writ jurisdiction of the High Court, being an extraordinary remedy, could not be invoked as a panacea for all grievances, particularly where an equally efficacious, alternate, and adequate statutory remedy existed

The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies operated as a jurisdictional bar, precluding litigant from resorting to constitutional remedies under Art. 199 of the Constitution without first availing themselves of the statutory mechanisms expressly provided by law

The underlying rationale of this doctrine was to prevent litigants from circumventing established statutory frameworks, thereby ensuring that the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of the High Court was not diluted into an ordinary appellate forum

The term 'adequate remedy' signified a remedy that was not merely theoretical but was, in fact, efficacious, expeditious, convenient, and effectual in redressing the aggrieved party's grievance

Thus, the discretionary exercise of writ jurisdiction must remain an exception rather than the rule, reserved only for cases where no equally effective alternative exists

The petitioner had failed to establish grounds warranting indulgence of High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution, hence, under the circumstances the constitutional petition was dismissed.

2025 CLC 75 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
'As soon as possible'Meaning

To do something within a reasonable time, with an understanding to do it within the shortest possible time.

2024 SCMR 997 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 218 & 225Expressions "election" and "conduct the election" as used in Articles 218 & 225 of the ConstitutionMeaning

Both expressions have been used in Articles 218 & 225 of the Constitution in a wide sense to connote the entire election process consisting of several steps starting with the issuance of the election programme and culminating with the declaration of the returned candidate, which includes filing of the nomination papers, scrutiny of the nomination papers, withdrawal of the candidates, holding the poll, counting of the votes, consolidation of the result and declaration of the returned candidates, etc.

In this wide sense, the process of conducting the election starts with the issuance of the election programme and stands completed on the publication of the names of the returned candidates in the official gazette.

2024 SCMR 476 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 497Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)BailPrinciplesExpression reasonable grounds used in section 497, Cr.P.CMeaning

Expression "reasonable grounds" as contained under section 497, Cr.P.C., necessitates the prosecution to show that it is in possession of sufficient material or evidence to demonstrate that accused had committed an offence falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C.

However for seeking the concession of bail, the accused person has to show that the material or evidence collected during investigation against him creates reasonable doubt or suspicion in the prosecution case

While deciding bail applications, it is the foremost duty of the Courts to apply judicious mind tentatively for reaching the just and proper conclusion regarding whether reasonable grounds are made out or not to enlarge the accused on bail, and the expression 'reasonable grounds' signifies and corresponds to the grounds which are legally rational, acceptable in evidence and attractive to the judicial mind, as opposed to being imaginative, fallacious and/or presumptuous

Whenever reasonable doubt ascends with regard to the involvement of an accused person in the crime or about the certainty or probability of the prosecution case and the evidence proposed to be produced in support of the charge in Court during trial, the accused should not be deprived of the benefit of bail and it would be better to keep him on bail than in jail.

2024 PLD 838 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of the High CourtScopeAlternate remedyAdequate remedyMeaning

Expression adequate remedy represents an efficacious, reachable, accessible, advantageous and expeditious remedy.

2024 PTD 196 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
'Nova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet, non praeteritis, principle ofMeaning

Said maxim means 'a new law ought to regulate what is to follow, not the past'.

2024 PTD 889 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 2(29)Term, "income"Meaning

Resort cannot be made to definition of 'income' as given in dictionaries since the term has already been defined in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

2024 MLD 1233 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.173Election disputeNomination papers, acceptance ofOmission of substantial natureMeaningWeapon, non-disclosure ofFalse declarationScope

Petitioner / objector assailed nomination papers of respondent / candidate on the plea that he made false declaration by not disclosing weapons in his ownership and that his company was a bank defaulter

Validity

Non-disclosure of licensed weapon of both prohibited as well as non-prohibited bores was not an omission of substantial nature as official record duly certified existence of such fact

Furthermore a settlement agreement was reached in High Court whereby date of discharge of liability of bank was extended to March 2025

Discrepancies in land holding and income could not be ascertained with expenditure in summary proceedings and could be agitated in post-election scenario

High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Election Tribunal accepting nomination papers of respondent

Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

2024 MLD 822 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 4, 7 & 11Complaint to OmbudspersonCivil suit, pendency ofWord "pending"MeaningOmbudsperson Punjab, jurisdiction ofPetitioners were aggrieved of decision against them passed by the Punjab OmbudspersonValidity

S.4 of the Punjab Enforcement of Women's Property Rights Act ,2021 (the Act 2021) provides a different regime than S.7, where a suit is pending

Term "pending" means the proceedings have already been initiated/commenced prior to the filing of complaint under S.4 of the Act 2021

Once S.4 of the Act 2021 is triggered, the bar under S.11 of the Act 2021 becomes effective

Word "pending" means any action, in law, considered pending from time of its commencement

In the present case, regarding the properties which were subject matter of the complaint, no proceedings before any Court of law were pending, therefore the Ombudsperson correctly exercised jurisdiction

Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

2024 PLC(CS) 1325 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
'Expressio unius est exclusio alterius'MeaningExpression of one thing implies the exclusion of others

Where a statute has conferred a power to do an act and prescribed a mechanism for exercise of that power, such power cannot be exercised for the purposes of performing the act by adopting a different method, other than what has been prescribed.

2024 PLD 129 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Care-takerMeaningCare-taker is a person who takes care of certain things and fulfills his responsibility so entrusted to himSuch person holds the fort to protect and discharge his assigned duties

Care-taker is the one who looks after in the owner's absence.

2024 PLC(CS) 1152 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
'Necessary'MeaningWord "necessary" means that is indispensable, needful or essentialAs per the Advanced Law Lexicon (3rd Edition), "necessary" means indispensable, essential, unavoidable etc.

Word "necessary" must be construed in connection in which it is used.

2023 SCMR 1919 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
'Per incuraim'Meaning

Decision of a Court becomes per incuriam when it is rendered in ignorance of a statute or a rule having the force of statute.

2023 SCMR 1442 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of the High CourtScopeDisputed questions of factExpression 'alternate remedy'Meaning

Scope and purpose of constitutional jurisdiction of High Court stated.

2023 SCMR 1267 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of the High CourtScope"Adequate remedy"Meaning

Extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is envisioned predominantly for affording an express remedy where the unlawfulness and impropriety of the action of an executive or other governmental authority could be substantiated without any convoluted inquiry

Expression "adequate remedy" signifies an effectual, accessible, advantageous and expeditious remedy which should also be remedium juris i.e. more convenient, beneficial and effective

To effectively bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, the remedy available under the law must be able to accomplish the same purpose which is sought to be achieved through a writ petition

Extraordinary jurisdiction (of the High Court) is provided as remedy to cure an illegality which can be established without any elaborate enquiry into disputed facts.

2023 SCMR 1103 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 30(a)Arbitration awardGrounds for setting aside AwardMisconduct by ArbitratorMeaning

Misconduct of an Arbitrator in the judicial sense means failure to perform his essential duty or any conduct inconsistent with his duties, resulting in substantial miscarriage of justice between the parties.

2023 SCMR 929 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 391 & 396Dacoity and dacoity with murderExpression 'conjointly'Meaning

Use of word 'conjointly' in sections 391 & 396, P.P.C. indicates that five or more dacoits act with knowledge and consent and in aid of one another or pursuant to an agreement or understanding, i.e., unitedly

For the offence of dacoity, the essential pre-requisite is the joint participation of five or more persons in the commission of the offence

If in the course thereof any one of them commits murder, all members of the assembly would be guilty of dacoity with murder and would expose themselves to the punishment stipulated in section 396, P.P.C.

2023 PLD 661 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 19AExpression "matters of public importance" used in Article 19A of the ConstitutionMeaning

Said expression means the matters that pertain to and affect the public at large, a whole community, and not an individual or a small group of individuals; in other words, it includes the matters in which the general interest of a whole community, as opposed to the particular interest of individuals, is directly and vitally concerned

Adjective "public" necessarily implies a matter relating to the people at large, the nation, the State or a community as a whole; if a matter in which only a particular individual or group of individuals is interested and the people at large or an entire community have no interest, that cannot be treated as a matter of public importance.

2023 PLC(CS) 495 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Medically fitMeaning

Expression "medically fit" means, a person/candidate who for the time being, is not suffering from any physical and/or mental inability and disability

An employee is considered medically fit to continue working as long as his health does not affect his job performance.

2023 PLD 694 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art.199(1)(a)(i)Writ of mandamusMeaning

Article 199(1)(a)(i) of the Constitution empowers the High Court to issue direction to the authorities working within its territorial jurisdiction who have failed to decide any pending matter and thus have not performed their duties as required by law

High Court can (and must) issue direction to every functionary to do the needful provided that this is done in accordance with law as it is their duty to act fairly, justly and reasonably in the discharge of the said duties.

2023 PLD 669 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 5, Sched.Suit for recovery of dowry articlesDowry articlesMeaning

Any gift given to the groom at the time of engagement, cannot be treated as part of the dowry as the same is not the property of wife rather ownership vests with the husband

Dowry is only such articles that are given at the time of marriage to the bride and not the gifts to the bridegroom at the time of engagement.

2023 PTD 268 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Expressio unius est exclusion alteriusMeaning

Expression of one thing is exclusion of the other.

2023 PTD 268 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Expressio unius est exclusion alteriusMeaning

Expression of one thing is exclusion of the other.

2023 PLD 433 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 4'Minor''Guardian''Ward'Meaning

Unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context, S. 4 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, defines the 'Minor' as a person who, under the provisions of the Majority Act, 1875, is to be deemed not to have attained his Majority; the 'Guardian' means a person having the care of the person of a minor or his property, or of both his person and property and the 'Ward' means a minor for whose person or property or both there is a guardian.

2023 YLR 193 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 5 & Sched.Prompt or deferred dowerMeaningPresumption of correctness attached to NikahnamaWife filed suit for recovery of dowry articles and dower through different suitsBoth the suits were contested by the petitioner (husband)Petitioner also filed separate suit for restitution of conjugal rights

Trial Court partially decreed the suit of wife and also decreed the suit for conjugal rights subject to the payment of dower

Husband filed appeal before Appellant Court, which was dismissed

Held, that there was no denial regarding the existence of Nikah

However, husband had shown his reservations regarding column No.16 of the Nikah Nama that land mentioned in that column was not settled as dower but it was written in the Nikah Nama just to show off

Amount of prompt dower was Rs.1000 which was mentioned in column No.13 of Nikah Nama which was payable on demand, whereas, in column No.16 of the Nikah Nama the property mentioned as 16 kanal was a deferred dower which could only be payable either in case of separation between the husband and wife or in case of death of the husband

2023 PCrLJ 487 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MisappropriateMeaningsDishonestly or unfairly take for one's own use

To take somebody else's money or property for yourself, especially when they have trusted you to take care of it.

2023 CLC 1750 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.5, Sched.Execution of decree for maintenance allowanceTransfer of Property in husband's nameCancellation ofSham TransactionMeaning

Transaction whereby property was sold or transferred by the husband judgment debtor to his close relatives in order to avoid payment of maintenance allowance against decree passed in favour of his wife and children, was a sham transaction and the said transaction and any superstructure built on the same could not be sustained

Where basic transaction was declared as sham superstructure built on the same was also not sustainable and should collapse.

2023 PLD 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
UrgencyMeaning

Urgency in common parlance, connotes taking of immediate steps.

2023 PTD 985 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquumMeaning

When anything is prohibited directly, it is prohibited also indirectly.

2023 YLR 40 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Good faith"Meaning

Good faith is an abstract term not capable of any rigid definition and ordinary dictionary meaning describes it as "honesty of intention".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Meaning", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937007

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning"

SCMR 2019
Decided on 3rd April, 2019.

2019 S C M R 885

STOCKER — Appellant Versus STOCKER — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of UK*
PTD 1968
Reference Case No. 4 of 1968, decided on 27th March 1968.

1968 P T D 724

DACCA‑Applicant Versus A. KHALEQUE‑Respondent

Court: Dacca (Pakistan)
PLD 1988
Writ Petition No.609 of 1981, decided on 11th June 1986.

P L D 1988 Lahore 802

THE STATE‑‑ Petitioner Versus ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN and others‑ ‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 1987
High Court Appeal No.17 of 1984, decided on 1st February, 1987.

1987 M L D 600

Messrs V/O TECHMASH-EXPORT — Appellant Versus Messrs AKBAR COTTON MILLS LTD. and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1969
Reference Case No. 4 of 1968, decided on 27th March 1968.

P L D 1969 Dacca 265

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA‑Applicant Versus A. KHALEQUE‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1970
Second Appeal from Order No. 11 of 1969, decided on 26th May 1969.

P L D 1970 Lahore 140

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus Mian MAHMOOD AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS -Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 2023
The PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and others Civil Review Petitions Nos. 255 and 570 of 2021, decided on 14th March, 2023.

2023 P L C (C

NADIA NAZ and another Versus The PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and others Civil Review Petitions Nos. 255 and 570 of 2021, decided on 14th March, 2023.

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1989
Writ Petition No.3575 of 1980, decided, on 5th November, 1988.

1989 C L C 1642

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ‑‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL EXCISE AUTHORITIES‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1961
Criminal Appeal No. 637 of 1960, decided on 12th June 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

SANAULLAH‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 1996
I. T. As. Nos. 411/IB and 412/IB of 1993-94, decided on 27th September, 1995

1996 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan