Home Maxims & Terms Financial bid meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Financial bid

Financial bid legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 CLD 1269 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Rr. 33, 36 & 38Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionPublic procurementFinancial bidVested right of bidderScope

Port Trust (KPT) invited bids for procurement of two Pilot Boats and petitioner claimed to be the lowest bidder having vested right to its bid to be accepted but KPT did not award contract

Validity

At the end of bidding, there were only two bids left; one by petitioner and other by another bidder

Petitioner's bid was for Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) hull and that of the other bidder was for steel hull, therefore, prima facie the two were apples and oranges and could not be compared with each other

In tender documents, type of material for hull, GRP or Steel was not specified, therefore, it could be either

Even if the two bids remaining in field were treated as comparable and therefore, should have been compared with each other, in presence of only two bids, there could be a "lower" bid and a "higher" bid but there could not be " the lowest bid", which adjective being in superlative degree and not in comparative degree required at least three to be compared with each other

High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by authorities

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.

2012 CLC 1230 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Rr. 33, 36 & 38Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionPublic procurementFinancial bidVested right of bidderScope

Port Trust (KPT) invited bids for procurement of two Pilot Boats and petitioner claimed to be the lowest bidder having vested right to its bid to be accepted but KPT did not award contract

Validity

At the end of bidding, there were only two bids left; one by petitioner and other by another bidder

Petitioner's bid was for Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) hull and that of the other bidder was for steel hull, therefore, prima facie the two were apples and oranges and could not be compared with each other

In tender documents, type of material for hull, GRP or Steel was not specified, therefore, it could be either

Even if the two bids remaining in field were treated as comparable and therefore, should have been compared with each other, in presence of only two bids, there could be a "lower" bid and a "higher" bid but there could not be " the lowest bid", which adjective being in superlative degree and not in comparative degree required at least three to be compared with each other

High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by authorities

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Financial bid", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937017

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Financial bid"

CLC 2020
2020-February-14

2020 C L C 1434

TELCONET PRIVATE LIMITED — Petitioner Versus I.E.S.C.O and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
MLD 2021
2020-May-5

2021 M L D 1846

RELIANCE IT SOLUTIONS (PVT.) LTD. Through Authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
CLC 2021
2020-September-29

2021 C L C 1939

MEDIQUIPS (PVT.) LTD. Through Authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)
CLC 2024
2024-February-21

2024 C L C 1370

HAFEEZ ULLAH LEHRI and another — Petitioners Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 2020
2020-May-5

P L D 2020 Islamabad 378

NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FACILITATION TECHNOLOGIES (PVT.) LIMITED through duly Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus The FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 7 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2017
2016-July-1

2017 C L C 126

Messrs AIR CIRO through Senior Partner — Petitioner Versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director-General and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2024
2024-April-8

2024 C L C 1394

Messrs MUHAMMAD RAMZAN & COMPANY — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
CLC 2022
N/A

2022 C L C 364

KHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Partner/Attorney — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE through Secretary HUD and PHED Government of the Punjab, Lahore and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2020
2019-December-13

2020 C L C 693

Messrs LAC (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2012
2012-March-13

2012 C L C 1230

SAFEHAVEN MARINE LTD. Through duly constituted Attorney — Petitioner Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST — Respondent

Court: Sindh