Home Maxims & Terms Discretion of authorities meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Discretion of authorities

Discretion of authorities legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 YLR 715 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionAuction proceedingsDiscretion of authoritiesPetitioner was the highest bidder but authorities cancelled the auctionValidity

Petitioner participated in auction proceedings by accepting stipulated terms and conditions duly written in auction proclamation wherein authorities reserved their right to accept or reject the bid

Exercise of discretion by relevant authority was not amenable to interference in Constitutional jurisdiction unless the same was arbitrary, fanciful or violative of any of the fundamental rights

Relevant authority had exercised its discretion as conferred by law

Auction in favour of petitioner was not approved, therefore, petitioner did not acquire any vested right in the land and had no locus standi to ask for its transfer

Action of relevant authority was not arbitrary, fanciful or violative of any of the fundamental rights requiring interference in Constitutional jurisdiction

High Court declined to interfere in the matter

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.

2012 CLD 1269 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
R. 33Bid, cancellation ofDiscretion of authoritiesScope

Public functionaries are trustees of public power and are required to act fairly, justly and for valid reasons and are not required to act whimsically, capriciously or arbitrarily.

2012 CLC 1230 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
R. 33Bid, cancellation ofDiscretion of authoritiesScope

Public functionaries are trustees of public power and are required to act fairly, justly and for valid reasons and are not required to act whimsically, capriciously or arbitrarily.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Discretion of authorities", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937018

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Discretion of authorities"

PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 53 of 1978, decided on 28th February 1979.

1980 P L C (C

GHULAM QADIR Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND ANOTHER

Court: Service Tribunal Sind
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. 83 of 1990, decided on 29th August, 1991.

1992 P L C (C

Syed BASHIR AHMED SHAH Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH C & W, KARACHI and 2 others

Court: Service Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 1988
Appeal No. 78 of 1988, decided on 3rd August, 1988.

1988 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD NIHAR Versus THE COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR DIVISION, PESHAWAR and 2 others

Court: Service Tribunal N: W.F.P.
CLC 1987
Revision Application No. 386 of 1986, decided on 16th December, 1986.

1987 C L C 1806

SHABBIR HUSSAIN and others‑‑Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1998
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1435‑L of 1996, decided on 9th December, 1996.

1998 S C M R 1256

TAJ & COMPANY through General Manager Muhammad Hussain ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS through

Court: High Court
SCMR 2006
Cr.Ps.L.A. Nos.62 to 64-K of 2005, decided on 20th December, 2005.

2006 S C M R 1376

A.R. AWAN and others — Petitioners Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-116 of 1979, decided on 27th January, 1980.

1980 S C M R 722

IRTIQA RASOOL HASHMI-Petitioner Versus WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Court: -- Art. 212-Appeal against order of Service Tribunal- Held, com petent only on ground of law of public importance-Plea of fact in such case cannot be agitated before Supreme Court.-Question of fact.
SCMR 1985
Civil Appeal No.24-K of 1982, decided on 23rd September, 1984.

1985 S C M R 280

AIJAZ ALI MANGI — Appellant Versus THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others — Respondents

Court: ---R.5(3)--Punishment, quantum of--Matter, held, within discretion of Authority and its decision was hardly open to .interference on ground of lapse being in nature of a stray incident.--Sentence.
PLC(CS) 1976
Appeal No. 779 of 1974, decided on 17th January 1975.

1976 P L C 839

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN Versus GULZAR MUHAMMAD

Court: IIIrd Labour Court Punjab
PLC(CS) 1995
Constitutional Petition No. 3079 of 1993, decided on 28th April, 1994.

1995 P L C (C

ABDUL SATTAR BHUTTO Versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through its Director‑General, Karachi and 7 others

Court: Karachi High Court