Discretion of authorities
Discretion of authorities legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner participated in auction proceedings by accepting stipulated terms and conditions duly written in auction proclamation wherein authorities reserved their right to accept or reject the bid
Exercise of discretion by relevant authority was not amenable to interference in Constitutional jurisdiction unless the same was arbitrary, fanciful or violative of any of the fundamental rights
Relevant authority had exercised its discretion as conferred by law
Auction in favour of petitioner was not approved, therefore, petitioner did not acquire any vested right in the land and had no locus standi to ask for its transfer
Action of relevant authority was not arbitrary, fanciful or violative of any of the fundamental rights requiring interference in Constitutional jurisdiction
High Court declined to interfere in the matter
Petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Public functionaries are trustees of public power and are required to act fairly, justly and for valid reasons and are not required to act whimsically, capriciously or arbitrarily.
Public functionaries are trustees of public power and are required to act fairly, justly and for valid reasons and are not required to act whimsically, capriciously or arbitrarily.
"Discretion of authorities", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937018
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Discretion of authorities"
1980 P L C (C
GHULAM QADIR Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND ANOTHER
Court: Service Tribunal Sind1992 P L C (C
Syed BASHIR AHMED SHAH Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH C & W, KARACHI and 2 others
Court: Service Tribunal Sindh1988 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD NIHAR Versus THE COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR DIVISION, PESHAWAR and 2 others
Court: Service Tribunal N: W.F.P.1987 C L C 1806
SHABBIR HUSSAIN and others‑‑Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1998 S C M R 1256
TAJ & COMPANY through General Manager Muhammad Hussain ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS through
Court: High Court2006 S C M R 1376
A.R. AWAN and others — Petitioners Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1980 S C M R 722
IRTIQA RASOOL HASHMI-Petitioner Versus WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court: -- Art. 212-Appeal against order of Service Tribunal- Held, com petent only on ground of law of public importance-Plea of fact in such case cannot be agitated before Supreme Court.-Question of fact.1985 S C M R 280
AIJAZ ALI MANGI — Appellant Versus THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND and others — Respondents
Court: ---R.5(3)--Punishment, quantum of--Matter, held, within discretion of Authority and its decision was hardly open to .interference on ground of lapse being in nature of a stray incident.--Sentence.1976 P L C 839
MUHAMMAD ZAMAN Versus GULZAR MUHAMMAD
Court: IIIrd Labour Court Punjab1995 P L C (C
ABDUL SATTAR BHUTTO Versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through its Director‑General, Karachi and 7 others
Court: Karachi High Court