Home Maxims & Terms Solitary witness meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Solitary witness

Solitary witness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 YLR 2060 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
WitnessSolitary witnessScope

Conviction can be recorded on the statement of a solitary witness.

2020 YLR 1423 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302(b), 324 & 337-F(v)Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, ghayr-jaifah, hashimahAppreciation of evidenceSolitary witnessInjured witnessScopeAccused was alleged to have attempted at the life of complainant and murdered another

FIR though was lodged with a delay of one day but it appeared that the police had received information on the day of the occurrence and the police officials had referred the injured to hospital, therefore, delay in lodging FIR was the fault of SHO (Station House Officer of Police Station)

Complainant had no enmity with the accused to involve him falsely by taking advantage of delay

Sole injured eye-witness had adhered to the prosecution version word by word and had fully supported the prosecution case by giving all necessary details

Medical evidence had corroborated the statement of complainant

Presence of complainant on the spot was also established on the basis of injuries received by him

Prosecution had successfully established the charge against the accused

Appeal was dismissed.

2020 YLR 1311 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
S. 302Qatl-i-amdAppreciation of evidencePrompt FIRSolitary witnessScope

Prosecution case was that the accused was standing in front of the house of deceased and upon being excoriated he fired upon the deceased

Accused was appositely nominated in the promptly lodged FIR

Solitary eye-witness had adhered to the prosecution version word by word and had fully supported the case by giving all necessary details

Testimony of solitary eye-witness itself was not a demerit or disqualification as could call for its repudiation, when otherwise it rang true and inspired confidence

Quality and not the quantity of the evidence had to be seen

Medical evidence was in complete harmony with the ocular testimony

Complainant and eye-witness had no enmity, whatsoever, to falsely depose against the accused

Prosecution had succeeded in proving the charge

Appeal was dismissed.

2012 PCrLJ 1274 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302(b) & 337-F(iii)Qatl-e-amd, causing hurtAppreciation of evidenceSolitary witnessValueQuality and not the quantity of evidence has to be considered while deciding a case

Confidence inspiring and trustworthy evidence of a sole witness can safely be relied upon for conviction.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Solitary witness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937067

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Solitary witness"

MLD 1996
Civil Revision No. 1233‑D of 1981, heard on 25th October, 1995.

1996 M L D 674

MUHAMMAD BASHIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Qazi BASHIR AHMAD and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1969
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 171 of 1968, decided on‑ 16th October 1968.

1969 S C M R 76

MALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1971
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 181 of 1971, decided on 8th October 1971.

1971 S C M R 659

OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus The STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2128-B of 1986, decided on 13th August, 1986.

1986 M L D 1835

LIAQUAT AL1 Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2011
Criminal Appeal No.8 of 2009, decided on 8th June, 2010.

2011 Y L R 311

IMRAN SHAH — Appellant Versus Mrs. DIL PART JANA and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2021
Criminal Petition No. 1001 of 2016, decided on 1st February, 2021.

2021 S C M R 2009

ASFANDIYAR — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 2010
2010-April-5

2010 P Cr

FARIDULLAH SHAH — =Petitioner Versus Syed NAWAZ SHAH alias GUL KHAN and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2000
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.39-Q of 1997, decided on 13th September, 1999:

2000SCMR 152

MEHBOOB ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 2005
2005-June-8

2005 P Cr

QUDRATULLAH — Appellant Versus MAISAM and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLC 1988
Applications Nos.89, 91,92, 93, 118 and 123 of 1987, decided on 26th October, 1987

1988 P L C 839

GHULAM RASOOL and 5 others Versus ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD.

Court: VIth Labour Court Sind