Home Maxims & Terms Distinction and connotation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Distinction and connotation

Distinction and connotation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 YLR 1954 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 7Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.164Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.30"Pleading guilty", "admission", and "confession"Distinction and connotation

Possibility of suicidal or self-inflicting confession, which could have been sponsored for substitution or for serving clandestine interests, should be eliminated, during course of its recording by the Trial Court in order to be sure of its genuineness in all respects

If mere confession under S.7(a) of Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 did not satisfy a prudent mind to be sure of fullest justice, court could adopt another form or manner of proof provided under S.7(b) of the said Ordinance

Law had expressly provided to adopt any one of the forms (a)(b) provided under S.7 of the Ordinance

Confession should not be taken as easy and painless method of disposal of a case, but as an instrument to unearth the truth through truthfulness of the confession, in order to take the case to its judicious disposal

Maximum counselling should be extended to the person making the confession in all aspects of its course and consequences as was evident in the Quran and Sunnah

There were subtle, both common as well distinct, points involved in terms 'admission', 'pleading guilty' and 'confession', but those terms were used by many in common practice, as if those were synonymous

'Admission' was to accept, or acknowledge that something was true especially unwillingly

'Confession' was special admission that one had done something wrong, that he felt guilty or bad about

To 'plead' was to make urgent and earnest request or specific plea, in respect of criminal charge

'Guilt' was state of having committed a wrong, a crime, which would bring bad feeling with responsibility for doing it

"Pleading guilty", in circumstances was earnest and truthful express confession, oral or written, including details about the crime by criminal suspect of guilt, knowing its consequences, in response to a specific criminal charge, with responsibility for having done it.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Distinction and connotation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937078

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Distinction and connotation"

PTD 2003
Special Central Excise Appeal No.75 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 868 of 2002, decided on 24th October, 2002.

2003 P T D 818

III, SUKKUR Versus Messrs MARI GAS COMPANY LIMITED

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2006
Customs Appeal No.9 of 2004, decided on 6th June, 2006.

2006 P T D 2231

NORTHERN POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD. through Project Director Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MULTAN

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2017
2016-December-22

P L D 2017 Balochistan 29

ROSSMERE INTERNATIONAL LTD. through Authorized Representative — Plaintiff Versus SEA LION INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING INC and 6 others — Defendants

Court: High Court
PTD 1999
I.T.As. Nos.2863/KB of 1986-87, 1301/KB, 1302/KB of 1997-98 and 114/KB of 1991-92, decided on 19th October, 1998.

1999 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
YLR 2012
Jail Criminal Appeal No.39/I of 2010 and Criminal Reference No.1/I of 2011, decided on 19th October, 2011.

2012 Y L R 1954

MAQSUD AHMAD alias SUDI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
CLC 1983
Writ Petition No. 655 of 1978, decided on 27th January, 1980.

1983 C L C 1540

MESSRS HOECHST PAKISAN LTD.‑Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1991
N/A

P L D 1991 Lahore 462

Syed ALI RAZA ASAD ABIDI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF, PRIME MINISTER

Court: High Court
PLD 1987
First Rent Appeal No. 479 of 1985, decided on 17th December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Karachi 287

Mtts. RAFIQA BEGUM THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIRS‑Appellant Versus MRs. MAHMOODA WAHIDINA‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ S. 15(2) (vii)‑Words "requires the premises in good faith" Meaning‑ "Desire" and "need"‑Distinction‑Requirement connotes that there should be an element of need.‑Words and phrases.
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 111 of 1958, decided on 12th May 1958.

P L D 1958 (W

ZAHIRUDDIN HASAN‑Petitioner Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, KARACHI

Court:
MLD 1991
1991-April-13

1991 M L D 1923

THE STATE — Petitioner Versus GHULAM RASOOL and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore