Qisas and Diyat
Qisas and Diyat legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Law of qisas and diyat as enforced in Pakistan, had been adapted by Azad Jammu and Kashmir and specially the Chapter XIV of Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 was in practice in Azad Jammu and Kashmir
Section 338-G, P.P.C. had been incorporated to authorize the Government to make such Rules as it could consider necessary for carrying out the purpose of said Chapter
Supreme Court, for doing complete justice in the case, in exercise of powers under S.42-A of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 directed the Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir to suitably amend the provisions of S.338-G, P.P.C. in the manner as in force in Pakistan and under its rule making powers conferred by S.338-G, P.P.C., the Government would make, Diyat, Arsh and Daman Funds Rules, like the rules as in force in Pakistan called "Diyat, Arsh and Daman Funds Rules, 2007".
"Qisas and Diyat", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937094
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Qisas and Diyat"
1997 P Cr
GHULAM HUSSAIN and 3 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1996 P Cr
ABDUL GHAFFAR and another — Petitioners Versus JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT NO. 1 (Pb.) FOR SUPPRESSION
Court: Lahore2002 M L D 447
MUNEERUDDIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1992 P Cr
MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2001 Y L R 1639
SHAHBAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2017 P Cr
FAIZ-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1995 M L D 1210
PASHAM KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar2014 M L D 1046
ABDUL QAYYUM — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh1991 M L D 1864
DAWAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2003 P Cr
MUKHTAR AHMAD alias MUKHOO — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore