Home Maxims & Terms Compromise decree and agreement meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Compromise decree and agreement

Compromise decree and agreement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 PLD 324 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 18 & 19Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.2(2), 12(2) & O.XXIII, R.3Compromise decree and agreementDistinguishedSetting aside of compromise decree and agreementPrinciplesCompromise agreement is made by parties and compromise decree by Court

If agreement is successfully impugned then decree almost always fails, but it may be possible to attack the decree without impugning the agreement

Challenge to one is, therefore, not necessarily a challenge to the other

Grounds on which the agreement on one hand and the decree on the other can be attacked may overlap but are nonetheless distinct, it may be that as a matter of form, the challenge is directed towards the decree

Substance of challenge has to be carefully ascertained and distinction between decree and agreement must be kept in mind

If a compromised matter is challenged on the ground of misrepresentation, it is important to be clear, whether attack is directed against agreement or decree

Compromise agreement is simply a contract and can be impugned on the ground of misrepresentation, if matter comes within the ambit of Ss.18 and 19 of Contract Act, 1872, and compromise decree, on the other hand, can be set aside under S.12(2), C.P.C.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Compromise decree and agreement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937099

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Compromise decree and agreement"

CLD 2012
2012-March-14

2012 C L D 1192

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2012
2012-March-14

2012CLD 1136

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 2012
2012-March-14

P L D 2012 Sindh 324

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Civil Miscellaneous No.2356‑C of 1984 and 134‑B of 1985 in C.O.S. No.50 of 1983, decided on 9th March, 1988.

1988 C L C 2106

BANK OF AMERICA‑‑Plaintiff Versus Messrs MAIRAJ SONS LTD. LAHORE and 11 others‑‑ Defendents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1971
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 824 of 1962, decided on 5th June 1968.

P L D 1971 Dacca 112

HOSSAIN ALI KHAN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus FIROZA BEGUM‑Plaintiff Respondent

Court:
CLC 1998
Civil Revision No,309‑D of 1996, heard on 25th March, 1998

1998 C L C 952

DAUD ARSHAD WATTOO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAFEEZ and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2021
2019-December-23

2021 C L C 877

Syed KHALILUDDIN — Plaintiff Versus RAFIQ AHMED QANDHARI and 6 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2024
2023-December-14

2024 C L D 563

HABIB BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus AMIN SOAP AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Respondent

Court: Sindh
CLD 2013
N/A

2013 C L D 2080

SAMBA BANK LTD. through Authorized Officers — Appellant Versus Messrs SYED BHAIS and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1990
Civil Appeal No.5 of 1987, decided on 10th December, 1989.

1990 M L D 379

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑Appellant Versus NOOR HUSSAIN and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)