Compromise decree and agreement
Compromise decree and agreement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
If agreement is successfully impugned then decree almost always fails, but it may be possible to attack the decree without impugning the agreement
Challenge to one is, therefore, not necessarily a challenge to the other
Grounds on which the agreement on one hand and the decree on the other can be attacked may overlap but are nonetheless distinct, it may be that as a matter of form, the challenge is directed towards the decree
Substance of challenge has to be carefully ascertained and distinction between decree and agreement must be kept in mind
If a compromised matter is challenged on the ground of misrepresentation, it is important to be clear, whether attack is directed against agreement or decree
Compromise agreement is simply a contract and can be impugned on the ground of misrepresentation, if matter comes within the ambit of Ss.18 and 19 of Contract Act, 1872, and compromise decree, on the other hand, can be set aside under S.12(2), C.P.C.
"Compromise decree and agreement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937099
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Compromise decree and agreement"
2012 C L D 1192
PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants
Court: Sindh2012CLD 1136
PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants
Court: SindhP L D 2012 Sindh 324
PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. — Plaintiff Versus Messrs KHAIRPUR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED and another — Defendants
Court: High Court1988 C L C 2106
BANK OF AMERICA‑‑Plaintiff Versus Messrs MAIRAJ SONS LTD. LAHORE and 11 others‑‑ Defendents
Court: LahoreP L D 1971 Dacca 112
HOSSAIN ALI KHAN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus FIROZA BEGUM‑Plaintiff Respondent
Court:1998 C L C 952
DAUD ARSHAD WATTOO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAFEEZ and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2021 C L C 877
Syed KHALILUDDIN — Plaintiff Versus RAFIQ AHMED QANDHARI and 6 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh2024 C L D 563
HABIB BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus AMIN SOAP AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Respondent
Court: Sindh2013 C L D 2080
SAMBA BANK LTD. through Authorized Officers — Appellant Versus Messrs SYED BHAIS and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1990 M L D 379
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑Appellant Versus NOOR HUSSAIN and another‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)