Public interest complaint
Public interest complaint legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Complainant contended that for corporate tax payers deriving income by providing/rendering services chargeable under Ss. 153(1)(b) & 153(6) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the electronic Income Tax Return (IT-1) for Tax year 2010 placed on the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) web portal gave misleading information to taxpayers and tax payable by them was not being correctly computed; that the electronic Income Tax Return understated a taxpayer's due income tax liability for the tax year 2010 and was not designed to take into account receipts/income liable to tax under normal tax regime, besides the income taxable under the minimum tax regime
Validity
Defectively designed electronic return for corporate taxpayers (service sector) showed incompetence, inefficiency and inaptitude on the part of the concerned officials and was tantamount to systematic mal-administration under S. 2(3)(ii) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2001
Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Federal Board of Revenue to ensure that in the future a fool-proof electronic Return was placed on the Federal Board Revenue's official web portal; to direct field formations to determine revenue losses that occurred due to defective e-Return, and to take steps to retrieve the loss, without charging any penalty or default surcharge to the concerned taxpayers.
"Public interest complaint", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937136
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public interest complaint"
2012 P T D 1488
WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2011 P T D 1672
WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT Versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2013 P T D (Trib
SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD Versus WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT, ADVOCATE HIGH COURT
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2018 S C M R 967
DELTA AIR LINES INC. — Appellant Versus GABOR LUKACS — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Canada2005 C L D 264
ENGLISH BISCUITS MANUFACTURERS (PVT.) LTD. and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MONOPOLY CONTROL AUTHORITY and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2016 Sindh 19
Messrs POPULAR INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. through Authorised Officer and another — Plaintiffs Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Sindh, Karachi and 4 others — Defendants
Court: High CourtP L D 1982 Karachi 302
AITBAR ALI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents
Court: S. 499/500/501/502 ‑ Defamation, offence of Dissemination of harmful imputation‑A condition precedent for constituting offence of defamation.‑Defamation.P L D 2023 Supreme Court 431
PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) through Chairman and another — Petitioners Versus Messrs ARY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (ARY DIGITAL) through Chief Executive Officer and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2014 C L D 610
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONCOMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY — Respondent
Court: IslamabadP L D 2014 Islamabad 79
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY — Respondent
Court: High Court