Home Maxims & Terms Obiter dictum meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Obiter dictum

Obiter dictum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLC(CS) 413 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art. 189Judgment of Supreme CourtObiter dictumScope

Court subordinate to Supreme Court is bound even by an obiter dictum of Supreme Court if it comes within the scope of Art. 189 of the Constitution.

2012 PLC 228 LABOUR-APPELLANT-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent

Defined and explained.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Obiter dictum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124937159

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Obiter dictum"

PLC 2012
Appeal No.LHR-384 of 2010, decided on 24th September, 2010.

2012 P L C 228

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF Versus PRESIDENT, HABIB BANK LIMITED

Court: Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal
SCMR 2006
Civil Petitions Nos.2155 and 2563 of 2004, decided on 9th December, 2005.

2006 SC MR 1317

Sh. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE GOREJA and others — Petitioners Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1950
Criminal Miscellaneous petition No. 1287 of 1946, decided on 1st May, 1947, under sections 491, 498 and 561‑A., Criminal Procedure Code, praying that the petitioner may be set at liberty and the judicial proceedings may be quashed.

P

LANGAR KHAN‑Convict‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 2017
N/A

2017 C L C 831

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, GUJRANWALA through Chairman — Appellant Versus Sardar ASGHAR ALI through L.Rs. and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2004
2004-June-30

2004 M L D 1815

Mian TARIQ MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights Division, Islamabad and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1975
Petition No. 611 of 1969, decided on 4th November 1974.

P L D 1975 Karachi 498

NAZAR MUHAMMAD AND 4 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, WEST PAKISTAN,. LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS-Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 2010
Constitutional Petitions Nos.D-57 to D-69, D-83 to D-85, D-97, D-145, D-368, D-863 to D-865, D-874, D-927, D-928, D-992, D-993, D-996 to D-1000, D-1003, D-1133 and 1157 of 2010, decided on 30th June, 2010.

2010 P L C (C

LAL KHAN Versus EMPLOYEE OLD AGE BENEFIT INSTITUTION through Chairman and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 2004
Constitutional Petition No.35 of 2002, decided on 8th April, 2004.

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 600

ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPERS SOCIETY and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHARY, J.‑‑‑Above noted petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan hereinafter referred to as the Constitution.
PLC 2019
Miscellaneous Appeal No.39 and C.M.A. No. 1143 of 1997, decided on 17th July, 2018.

2019 P L C 1

SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION Versus MEHRAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Secretary

Court: Sindh High Court
CLD 2012
2011-April-1

2012 C L D 218

Messrs HABIB BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus BANKING COURT NO.II and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh