Home Maxims & Terms Implication meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Implication

Implication legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PTD 319 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Taxing statute must be construed strictlyImplication

True implication of the principle that "taxing statute must be construed strictly" is often misunderstood and the principle is unjustifiably extended beyond the legitimate field of its operation.

2012 PLD 681 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 218(3)Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), S.103(a) & (c) , 78, 79, 80, 80-A, 81 & 83Election CommissionDuty to ensure fair electionsImplicationCognizable activitiesScope

Section 103(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976, instructed the Election Commission to ensure a "fair election", which implied that large scale malpractices including coercion, intimidation and pressures, prevailing at the election would negate the 'fairness' elections were to embody

Sections 78, 79, 80, 80-A, 81 and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976, specified activities that the Election Commission could regulate and check under Art.218(3), but section 103(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 substantially enhanced said defined spectrum of cognizable activities and reinforced the obligation to check them

Section 103(c) of the Act, empowered the Election Commission to issue instructions, exercise its powers and make orders to effectuate the said standard.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Implication", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938115

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Implication"

YLR 2004
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4187/B of 2003, decided on 9th December, 2003.

2004 Y L R 2377

MANZOOR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1985
Criminal Appeal No. 15(S) of 1984, decided on 18th May, 1985.

P L D 1985 Supreme Court 305

SULTAN MAQSOOD-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Shanat Appellate Bench
SCMR 1978
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 9-R of 1977, decided on 5th November 1977.

1978 S C M R 43

JAMIL AHMED-Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: -- S. 498-Bail-Fatal blow allegedly only a fist blow-Petition seeking cancellation of bail time-barred by more than one hundred days---Explanation for delay: minority of petitioner and his lack of knowledge of implications of order granting bail-Explanation held, not satisfactory particularly for reason of non-disclosure of when and hew petitioner realised, legal implications of impugned order and petition liable to dismissal as time-barred.-Limitation.
PCRLJ 1993
N/A

1993 PCr

MUHAMMAD AMIR and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1984
Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 1981, decided on 5th September, 1983.

1984 P Cr

ABDUL WAHEED-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 2002
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3741‑B of 2002, decided on 28th June, 2002.

2002 Y L R 2438

RAFIQUE AHMAD, S.S.O‑II and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2010
2009-September-29

2010 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2122/13 of 1982, decided on 5th September, 1982.

1987 P Cr

ABDUL QAYYUM NIAZI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2001
Criminal Bail Application No.638 and Miscellaneous Application No. 1781 of 2000, decided on 23rd November, 2000.

2001 M L D 582

JALAL alias MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE-‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi `
MLD 1989
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 394/B of 1989, decided on 7th February, 1989.

1989 M L D 642

MUHAMMAD ZAHID‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore