Parliamentary supremacy
Parliamentary supremacy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
His Lordship observed that there was no justification in our dispensation, for muddying the crystal and undefiled waters of our constitutional stream with alien and antiquated, 19th Century Diceyan concepts of Parliamentary supremacy, and that it was about time, that we unchained ourselves from the shackles of obsequious intellectual servility to colonial paradigms and started adhering to our own peoples' Constitution as the basis of decision making on constitutional issues.
"Parliamentary supremacy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938126
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Parliamentary supremacy"
2017 C L C 1204
MAL PAKISTAN LTD. through Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division and Ex-Officio Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue and another — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2019 Sindh 209
K-ELECTRIC (PVT) LTD. through authorized Officer/Attorney and others Petitioners Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2022 Supreme Court 64
HADAYAT ULLAH and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2001 Supreme Court 1028
Dr. A. BASIT, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2016 P T D 2269
Messrs MUSTAFA IMPEX, KARACHI and others Versus The GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2022 Islamabad 64
PAKISTAN MUSLIM LEAGUE (N) through Parliamentary Party Leader in Senate — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2016 Supreme Court 808
Messrs MUSTAFA IMPEX, KARACHI and others — Appellants Versus The GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2025 Supreme Court 319
ADIL KHAN BAZAI — Appellant Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtL D 1990 Lahore 401
WASI ZAFAR ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus SPEAKER PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑ Art. 199 ‑‑‑ Proceedings in Constitutional petition ‑‑‑ Adjournment ‑‑‑ Advocate General remained present on the last date of hearing ‑‑‑ Advocate‑General seeking adjournment through a private legal practitioner instead of deputing any one out of the Additional Advocates‑General and the team of the Assistant Advocates‑General, the Law officers appointed by the Provincial Government‑‑‑ Request for adjournment was opposed by the petitioner saying that adjournment was being sought to frustrate the petition as well as the prayer for interim relief and, if the request for adjournment was allowed petition would be rendered infructuous ‑‑‑ High Court, in view of such unprecedented conduct of Advocate General, and other Law Officers and the fact that no justification was made out for adjourning the petition, decided to proceed with the same and not to adjourn it and allowed the petitioner to continue with his arguments.‑‑Advocate General ‑‑‑ Adjournment.2013 S C M R 1062
NADEEM AHMED ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan