Permissible
Permissible legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Civil servant cannot escape departmental proceedings or consequences thereof on account of his acquittal/ exoneration on a criminal charge arising out of the same impugned transaction; these two are entirely different jurisdictions with different standards of proof as well as procedures
Criminal prosecution requires strict proof through a narrowly jacketed procedure and, thus, State's failure on the criminal side does not provide shield of double jeopardy to a delinquent officer.
Civil servant cannot escape departmental proceedings or consequences thereof on account of his acquittal/ exoneration on a criminal charge arising out of the same impugned transaction; these two are entirely different jurisdictions with different standards of proof as well as procedures
Criminal prosecution requires strict proof through a narrowly jacketed procedure and, thus, State's failure on the criminal side does not provide shield of double jeopardy to a delinquent officer.
Duly constituted Board can recommend reinvestigation of the case even after submission of challan, under Art.18(6) of the Police Order, 2002.
"Permissible", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938189
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Permissible"
P
KARACHI‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus ALCOCK ASHDOWN & Co., LTD.‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1970 Dacca 577
Haji MD. ISHAQUE‑Petitioner Versus NIRMAL KRISHNA PODDAR AND OTHERS — Opposite‑ — Parties
Court:P L D 1986 Karachi 23
I. D. JEHANI‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ S. 129‑Phrase "subject to the provisions of the rules"‑Meaning and scope‑Appropriate officer, held, has to give permission in accordance with provisions of Rules, if any‑Silence of Rules as to giving of permission would not mean that no permission was required.‑Words and phrases.2011 Y L R 1444
SHAH MUHAMMAD and 26 others — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, SARGODHA through Administrate and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2004 Lahore 478
JEHANGIR BADAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2004 P Cr
JEHANGIR BADAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2015 C L C 1232
KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED through Group Director Finance — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB through Senior Member and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan2006 PTD (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan1986 M L D 1214
Syed ABDULLAH SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SANGHAR and another‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi