Guardianship of minor
Guardianship of minor legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Whatever the relationship could have been with the mother of the minor, petitioner / father had abandoned the minor at the time of his birth
Petitioner / father had complete lack of involvement, either financially or emotionally, with the child who had special needs
Family Court had rightly recorded findings that petitioner / father was an unfit person to be a guardian of minor and that such role was best assumed by respondents
High Court declined to interfere in judgment passed by Family Court appointing respondents as guardians as there was no illegality or infirmity in it
Constitutional petitions dismissed, in circumstances.
Guardian Court had the bounden duty to examine the welfare of the minor and the statement of the mother or the father in such regard had no relevancy.
"Guardianship of minor", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938191
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Guardianship of minor"
2021 C L C 704
NOSHEEBA NAZEER — Petitioner Versus SAJJAD AHMED and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2017 M L D 1677
Syed SHOUKAT GILLANI and another — Appellants Versus Mst. ANSAR GILLANI and others — Respondents
Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)P L D 1976 Karachi 506
Mst. KHATIJA KHATOON‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 10 & 25 read with Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), S. 25‑Guardian, appointment of‑Court's powers and duties in appointment of guardian or custody of minors‑In nature of parental jurisdiction‑Main question to be considered by Court‑Welfare of minor‑‑Court could consider personal law of minor but paramount consideration minor's welfare and protection of his interests‑No case under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, regarding custody or guardianship of minor could be decided merely by consent of parties or on compromise‑Pre‑trial hearing to induce parties to effect a compro mise on such matters not only unnecessary but even undesirable Mere technicalities of procedure‑Cannot affect decision of Guardian Judge based on broad principles in interests of minor.‑Custody of minor.2017 M L D 427
SHANZA ALI — Petitioner Versus AAMIR SHUJAAT and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2017 Y L R 1229
MOHAMMAD MOHSIN — Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 M L D 443
Syed NAZIR AHMED SHAH GILLANI — Appellant Versus Syeda NAZIA GILLANI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 1970 Karachi 619
Mst. TAHERA BEGUM‑Appellant Versus SALEEM AHMED SIDDIQUI‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1971 Karachi 897
DR. RAUF AHMED‑ — Petitioner Versus Mst. RAZIA FARHAT‑ — Respondent
Court: (b) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S. 25 & Sched. and Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), S. 9 Suit for custody and guardianship of children‑Whether to be instituted at place where minor ordinarily resides Quaere.P L D 2014 Lahore 317
SHAHIDA PARVEEN — Applicant Versus ZAFAR IQBAL — Respondent
Court: High Court2010 Y L R 1665
KAMRAN HANIF — Petitioner Versus BILQEES BANO and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore