Mining contract
Mining contract legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Single Judge of High Court had rightly held that it was not a matter of mere interpretation of contract, there were disputed questions of facts which the parties controverted and needed to be resolved
High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction, could not resolve disputed questions of fact
Division Bench of High Court declined to interfere in judgment passed by Single Judge of High Court
Intra-court appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Mining contract", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938230
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mining contract"
2017 M L D 761
M.E.F.T. PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through CEO/Chairman — Petitioner Versus GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary G.B. and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court2012 C L C 1571
Khawaja JAVED AKHTAR and others — Appellants Versus D.G. MINES AND MINERALS PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 C L C 1406
Mst. GHAZALA YASMEEN and 3 others — Appellants Versus SARFRAZ KHAN DURRANI — Respondent
Court: Lahore2026 M L D 89
Ghazi Mining private limited company through its ceo — Appellant Versus Shahid Hussain and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1987 C L C 1159
DOST MUHAMMAD LALI‑‑Petitioner Versus SARDARZADA MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Election Tribunal Punjab2012 C L D 598
GHULAM MURTAZA — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2012 S C M R 395
GHULAM MURTAZA — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2020 M L D 1849
AHMAR IQBAL — Petitioner Versus MINISTRY OF ENERGY (PETROLEUM DIVISION) ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2013 Supreme Court 641
Maulana ABDUL HAQUE BALOCH and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Industries and Mineral Development and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2014 Balochistan 55
Messrs PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT), LIMITED through Attorney — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF MINES AND MINERALS BALOCHISTAN and 140 others — Respondents
Court: High Court