Home Maxims & Terms Relief to be specifically stated meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Relief to be specifically stated

Relief to be specifically stated legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 CLC 1839 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. VII, R. 7Relief to be specifically stated"General or other relief", explainedScope

It is duty of the Court to consider the prayer in juxtaposition with the contents of the plaint and to grant the relief in terms of the prayer clause irrespective of the fact that it was specifically mentioned therein or not.

2013 YLR 2481 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.VII, R.7Relief to be specifically statedScope

Plaintiff was under obligation to seek all the reliefs about which he claimed to be entitled and such was not his prerogative to omit or relinquish any relief available to him

Court could grant leave to such extent and was empowered to grant such relief as the substantial justice required

Entire plaint was to be looked into for granting relief with reference to the substance

Court had ample power to grant the relief not specifically asked for either simply or in alternative.

2012 CLD 1608 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. VII, R. 7Relief to be specifically statedScopeFacts not disclosed in the pleadingsEffect

Provisions of Order VII, Rule 7, C.P.C. empowered the court to grant an effective or ancillary relief even if not prayed, as the plaint as a whole was to be looked into in order to determine relief for which plaintiff was entitled, however, no relief could be granted upon facts and documents not disclosed in the pleadings.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Relief to be specifically stated", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938258

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Relief to be specifically stated"

CLD 2012
2012-July-3

2012 C L D 1608

Syed PHOOL BADSHAH and others — Appellants Versus ADBP through Manager, Peshawar Branch and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2012
Civil Appeal No.110 of 2002, decided on 3rd July, 2012.

2012 S C M R 1688

Syed PHOOL BADSHAH and others — Appellants Versus ADBP through Manager, Peshawar Branch and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2013
Civil Revision Petition No.49-D of 2012, decided on 10th June, 2013.

2013 Y L R 2481

KALU KHAN and 6 others — Petitioners Versus ABDUL AZIZ — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2018
2016-November-4

2018 M L D 555

Mst. SHAH ZANAN and another — Petitioners Versus HADI HUSSAIN and 10 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
CLC 2007
the basis of the averments of the plaint and not on the basis of any defence which had been set up in the written statement---To resolve controversy, whether in a particular case, jurisdiction of civil court had been ousted or not, decision would depend upon the contents of the plaint and wording of the ouster clause---Question of ouster of jurisdiction by necessary implication was to be decided in the case according to the words used in special provision of the statute

2007 C L C 1229

GHULLAB BUTT and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Mir ABDUL GHANI — Respondent

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PLD 2005
2005-April-21

P L D 2005 Azad J&K 9

FEROZ-UD-DIN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AZIZ and 22 others — Respondents/Proforma Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 2023
2023-May-15

2023 C L C 1839

ABDUL MANAN and others — Petitioners Versus BAKHTI ALI and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)
PLD 2026
2025-April-10

P L D 2026 Sindh 65

SABIR HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus Mst. HINA UROOJ and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2021
N/A

2021 M L D 608

Syed IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2006
2005-September-30

P L D 2006 Supreme Court 66

JAVAID IQBAL — Appellant Versus ABDUL AZIZ and another — Respondents

Court: High Court