Recovery from accused
Recovery from accused legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Allegation against the accused and co-accused was that they waylaid the complainant and his companions while they were going for work in the morning, where after the accused and co-accused fired at and murdered the three deceased persons
Contentions of the accused were that nothing had been recovered from him; that there was tribal enmity between the parties; that at morning time before going for work most people relieved themselves and, therefore, presence of faecal matter in the large intestine of the deceased persons indicated that the incident had not occurred the way it was mentioned in the F.I.R.
Validity
Recovery was always a corroborative piece of evidence and question as to what was the effect of recovery or non-recovery could be gone into only once evidence was recorded
Mere non-recovery at the bail stage could not be a ground for granting bail
Existence of enmity was always a double edged weapon and it cut both ways
Question as to whether F.LR. was actuated out of enmity or that the incident was motivated out of enmity, both could be argued with equal amount of vehemence
Previous enmity did not help either side in most of the cases, at least at the bail stage
Contention of the accused regarding presence of faecal matter in the large intestines of the deceased persons would not detain the court as deeper appreciation of evidence could not be conducted at bail stage
Accused was member of an unlawful assembly, which specifically waylaid six persons and there was no question as to whom they wanted to kill
Present case was a case where almost war was declared by persons of one tribe against persons of the other hapless tribe
Sufficient material was available prima facie to connect the accused with the offence
Bail application of the accused was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Recovery from accused", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938435
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Recovery from accused"
1986 P Cr
WALI MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: Karachi1987 P Cr L J 1608
MUHAMMAD ZADA alias DILDAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1986 P Cr
MAHMOOD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: Karachi1988 P Cr
NOOR KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1995SCMR347
PUNHOON‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1991 M L D 1398
MUHAMMAD SARWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 P Cr
KHUSHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2017 P Cr
ALI HASSAN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2006 P Cr
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore